Bewertungen für Private Internet Access
Private Internet Access von PrivateInternetAccess
128 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 12220017, vor 8 Jahren
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 8 JahrenWe are happy to help you out. Please contact us by opening a ticket with us at: https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/helpdesk/new-ticket so we can help you out further. - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14058147, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14026476, vor 8 JahrenI have mixed feelings here. I totally recommend PIA as a service but not this add on.
Use the actual PIA Client and give this add-on a WIDE berth, it will NOT protect you and WILL reveal your IP address to anybody who is interested. Put bluntly, it just does not work reliably (if at all sometimes).
Sometimes it works, but sometimes it doesn`t, (yet reports that it is connected). - A simple IP lookup reveals all.
Proof:-
https://imgur.com/HnLFbIn (`connected` to london server, but IP lookup showing my Static IP).
https://imgur.com/T6b4mM7 (`connected` to California Server, but again showing my home IP).
A VPN is supposed to anonamize you as one of its primary functions and its clear that with this add-on, the VPN is sometimes not even being connected at all. The most worrying issue is that it reports as being `connected` yet clearly isn`t, which misleads you into thinking you are being protected, when in actuality , you are not.. When first downloaded, this IP look up test (and other similar services), accurately showed the VPN servers IP when tested, but a random test showed it had failed. I guess its possible that reloading the add-on may cure the issue, but whats to stop it failing again? Its not something I would feel happy relying on.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 8 JahrenHello, we'd like to remedy this issue as quick as possible. Is there some steps that you could send us to replicate this issue?
Could you also send us the version of the extension you are using?