Bewertungen für Save Page WE
Save Page WE von DW-dev
452 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon gracefool, vor 8 JahrenReally sad that unMHT died, it was better, for instance allowing the saving of multiple tabs. Also this one is lacking documentation - there's no explanation of the special fields in Saved File Name. Is there any way to customize them and are there any fields beyond doman, date and time?
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 8 JahrenThe only fields available are %DOMAIN%, %DATE% and %TIME%. These fields may appear in any order in the file name prefix and/or suffix, together with normal text. - Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon bonbonbillo, vor 8 Jahrenmany times can not save pictures, eg:articles of toutiao.com. not as good as unMHT.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 8 JahrenSave Page WE always saves the current state of the web page. This means Save Page WE will only save images that have already been loaded.
Just scroll to the bottom of the page, to force images to load, before using Save Page WE. - Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 12697017, vor 8 Jahrenexcellent extension...only 1 thing I miss: in UNMHT you had the option to save multiple tabs as .mht at once (either as a single-file mht or one mht file per page). COuld you please implement this option too?
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14055629, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14051258, vor 8 JahrenFantastic!! Saving one single web page used to leave dozens or even hundreds of small files in a folder that could get separated from the html. Now it is ALL IN ONE DOCUMENT. What an improvement! I wish I had this years ago. I only wish I could go back and convert my old ones into this format.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Idan Nabara, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13970483, vor 8 JahrenWhy there is no choice of a folder for saving a file?
Почему нет выбора папки для сохранения файла?Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 8 JahrenPlease follow these steps:
1. On the Firefox main menu bar, select ‘Tools’ and then ‘Options’.
2. Scroll down to the ‘Files and Applications’ section.
3. Set the ‘Downloads’ option to ‘Always ask you where to save files’.
Now when you use Save Page WE:
1. A popup window will open with two options: ‘Open with’ and ‘Save File’.
2. To save the file, select ‘Save File’ and click on ‘OK’.
3. A 'Save As' window will open allowing you to choose where to save the file. - Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14042328, vor 8 JahrenPrior to your update of this add-on, I could save any .xml page as a single .html file with a single click. As of 5/19/18, I get an error message, it won't save it at all, and much time spent setting the options on the add on is fruitless. I have relied on this add-on for months to simply convert my newsfeed xml to a single html document for viewing online, and I've pointed search engines to this html file. Now this add on doesn't work do this at all, and I'm spending time on a Sunday I needed to spend elsewhere trying to fix something that wasn't broken to begin with. Please re-enable this capability with the awareness that I am experiencing real and significant harm by relying on an add-on your making it available invited me to use only to suffer precisely because I accepted your invitation to use it. By any reasonable standard, that's not good.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 8 JahrenThe first thing to say is that Save Page WE is designed to save HTML pages, not XML pages.
With Save Page WE 9.7 & 9.8, it was possible to save XML pages providing the 'new save method' option was enabled. Unfortunately, some problems were found with the 'new save method', so it was removed in Save Page WE 9.9, and it is no longer possible to save XML pages. Apologies for any inconvenience. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14031835, vor 8 JahrenCan't send email to your address
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon grahamperrin, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13982633, vor 8 JahrenUnfortunately, it doesn't save personal entries and comments on any website, so disappointing.
It also has some issues with certain websites like ebay. - Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Vincent, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon am, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13578194, vor 8 JahrenIt works very well. It fails, sometimes, only in saving the typeface of the page, but with the right configuration* the information (text and images) is always stored. * I have set it to save "Chosen items" and chose "Html object and embed files".
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14012433, vor 8 JahrenIt saves all the information of a website if needed, including links and hypertext.
The only minus is:
unHMTL or MAFF also saved the address of the original webpage.
In "Save page WE" I cannot find this.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 8 JahrenIf you want to automatically display the address of the original web page when the saved page is opened, then enable the 'Include information bar at top of page' option.
Alternatively, you can use the 'View Saved Page Info' button/context menu command to display a lot of information about the saved file, including the address of the original web page. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon franc, vor 8 JahrenNice Add-On since FF57, as there is no replacement for MAFF and Mozilla Archive.
Since last Update it is also working on large websites (like ebay list of purchases), thanks! - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 5509918, vor 8 JahrenЕдинственное WE-дополнение, которое я нашел, чтобы сохранять WEB-страницы полностью. И оно работает !
Можно было бы добавить опцию, чтобы исключить сохранение рекламных ресурсов (например баннеров) и ссылок на них, например, введя black-list, или фильтр по какому-нибудь признаку.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 8 JahrenTry using the AdBlock Plus add-on before saving the page. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13941347, vor 8 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13935408, vor 8 JahrenIsn't possible to save a page from 4chan retaining the ability to preview a post when you hover over the mex starting with ">>"?
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13909005, vor 8 JahrenUnMHT was working fine but Save Page WE doesn't work fine.
Can you try to save this site?
http://animatorexpo.com/girl/
I was used this settings;
10 Maximum depth of saved nested frames
100 Maximum size allowed for a resource (MB)
60 Maximum time for loading a resource (secs)
It is downloading all sources but image slider doesn't work. I was tried with UnMHT and image slider worked.
Please fix this bug. I will give you 5 stars. We need really good extension. RIP UnMHT. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Yuniel Leal Yanes, vor 8 JahrenI really appreciate the effort you do with keep this wonderful kind of addon updated, but (there is always a "but")
Sorry for give you 3 stars, I change it if you can resolve the problem or explain me why can not to do, I'm explain:
----------------
+SOME PAGES CAN'T SAVE SOME IMAGES
OS: Windows 10 Pro 1709 16299.309
Firefox: 59.0.1
Save Page WE: 9.3
Save Page WE Options > Saved Items: All checked
Webpage I want to save: http://www.wowhead.com/guide=3799/17-garrison-followers-under-2-hours-17-alliance-14-horde (Web about game WoW)
Using: Save Standard Items
Problem: All (or the important) images hosted on another server are not saved (other server: wow.zamimg.com)
This addons when finished download files report me that can't save about 8 images more or less.
I read "almost" every review and can't saw response from Developer about this problem (some users report this), but I detail all to have exact the test enviroment.
-------
Thanks to developer for assist me with a solution, the problem was that I have very slow connection, and max timeout of 60s was to low, in the next version will increasy it.
Change my review to 5 star, you deserve it!!!Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 8 JahrenIt's good to hear that the longer timeout fixed the problem.