Bewertungen für Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized
Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized von Wikiwand
164 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Indiana Moon, vor einem JahrIt does not "enhance user experience" as stated in the add-on description section. It was good once.
Enshittification! - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14503325, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19040033, vor einem JahrUsed to be a great addon but now totally destroyed by the Ads and AI
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Ally Simy, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19035698, vor einem JahrEnshittification everywhere. Was a very nice plugin to cleanly read wikipedia, now cluttered with AI and ads
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon LCM, vor einem JahrThey had the nerve to actually BLOCK people from accessing entire wikipedia pages. You are required to watch an ad before you can access the page. This is allegedly to have access to their "wikicontent," which is not needed or desired. This app used to be good. But pulling this crap was a step too far. You CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE MONEY FROM ADS.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Milan Regec, vor einem JahrAll it does now is infest your Wikipedia with ads. Don't bother installing and I highly recommend uninstalling it if you already did so. Even when uninstalled, it keeps coming back and keeps stealing all Wikipedia links.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18996590, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Toccetness, vor einem JahrAd-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17669402, vor einem JahrAs many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Wolphie, vor einem JahrUsed to be a great extension/addon. Ruined by AI slop that apparently needs to appear everywhere now. Plus constant popups everywhere if cookies are cleared. Sad to see such a beautiful piece of work fall so low.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon winphreak, vor einem JahrI can't wait until the AI screws up all the detailed trivia bits or simple math for a article summary.
Also if Wikiepedia is too hard to read for you, you should probably finish middle school.
This world is gonna get so dumb so fast I can't wait. - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 12661639, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17046154, vor einem JahrUsed to be a solid add-on, but now pesters the user to login for "AI tools" every time a Wikipedia link is visited, causing unnecessary bloat and wasting the user's time. Why they absolutely ruined a good add-on is beyond me.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon StephenM, vor einem JahrIf I want AI, I'll either build my own local solution with whatever LLM I want for free or go to a website or use a separate app. Wikiwands' entire existence for being is to make the Wikipedia layout easier to read. Nothing else. Don't remake it ever. AI Wand, NOT Wikiwand. Utter JUNK made by JUNK developers, supported by JUNK people.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Celena, vor einem JahrThis used to be a good extension, which I used for many years across different browsers and devices. Today I've had enough and I'm going to uninstall it.
Before they started remaking it, it was very good. It was essentially a better layout for Wikipedia with not much else to it, but that's why I liked it. It made it clearer to read, easier to use, and just overall felt like a more updated version of Wikipedia's UI. Combined with an ad blocker, it was perfect. However, since the remake, it is worthless. It is so bloated. The majority of the page is taken up with AI stuff, and it wants you to use it constantly. It has made the layout even more confusing - while before I felt like it was very intuitive and more Wikipedia like, now it's just added so much more junk and confusing elements. Wikipedia is way easier to use.
With this latest update, I'm done. I was already getting frustrated with the way pictures were handled. If you clicked on it, there would be various bits of information that covered over part of the picture. Then there was so much blackspace that it wasn't always that much more visible than in the article. You zoom in and it's barely better. Now, I tried to look at the picture it used for the cover image, which no longer shows up in the sidebar as well. I clicked on it, and it was much the same as it used to be, although the information/other pictures below now fades away. Good! However I tried zooming in, because it was still not a big picture. It not only barely zoomed in, but moved the maybe two pixels bigger image around with my cursor. So now I had a very vaguely enlarged picture of some people that bounced around as I tried to exit out of it. Cool!!!!!! Good thing I never use Wikipedia to look at things like art as someone who enjoys art history!!!
The AI is too much, the paywall is too much, the needing to have a separate account for it is too much. And now they have continued to just make the UI worse and worse. I'm done here. I'm so sad that this has gone this way. I'm so disappointed. They had something good and it's useless now. I'd rather use normal Wikipedia, and that's the first time I've said that in many years. - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17490856, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17143382, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon DS, vor 2 JahrenLove how Wikiwand used to be an incredibly useful product that made Wikipedia more readable and now it's... "AI-driven" slop garbage that no one wants or asked for. Yet another product "improving" itself right out of usefulness. What a waste.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17984040, vor 2 JahrenShoves GenAI garbage down your throat and the pop ups blocks half the screen. Also sells your data. Just go use something like Modern for Wikipedia
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14774990, vor 2 JahrenGreat design, but ruined by first having AI shoved in my face and now ads everywhere. Back to classic Wikipedia.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Steedlan, vor 2 JahrenWas great, but the recent changes made the UI awful and turn this add-on into a whole cash cow that is against the principles of Wikipedia
- Too much ads, trying to hide bring to a paywall, adding CSS doesn't worth 5$. Even with an adblock the banner background stays.
- They added an AI that is completely useless and only here to surf on the trend of AIs.
- Talking about ads it requires a Wikimand account despite that Wikipedia already have one
We can't accept an add-on that makes money off Wikipedia - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Mlse, vor 2 Jahrenused to be good, then over the years it became incrementally more annoying to use. first all this AI/ account stuff (which was tolerable but annoyinh), paywalls and now ads everywhere. its just not worth it for that marginal improvement over stock wiki.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18160256, vor 2 JahrenWas once good, now it is terrible and full of ads.
The ads can be blocked with an ad-blocker but it will leave placeholder boxes. If you're using ublock Origin, you can remove them with the "block Element function" though you will need to tune it to remove them entirely.
Target the 'remove ads' part, and tune the left slider once to the left. Preview shows the results in real-time.