Reviews for Web Archives
Web Archives by Armin Sebastian
Review by KirkH420
Rated 4 out of 5
by KirkH420, 4 years agoIt works to some extent, I like it's ability to open all the different web archives with one click.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
333 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by BaraShiro, 3 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by ilovemikael, 12 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Jatila, 15 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by GnarlyCmdr, 16 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19720321, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Dan, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17451381, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Jalewood, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15958710, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Java, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19611278, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19604848, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by أبوعلي, 5 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Ugarov, 6 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18960744, 7 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Deo, 7 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Kaqxar, 7 months agoAlas it breaks login pages which use Cloudflare captcha!
I first thought that uBO and/or Privacy Badger are the culprit and disabled those, but then still could reliably reproduce the bug. Then I disabled *ALL* my extensions and enabled them one by one, meanwhile testing logging in. When I turned on Web Archives, login stopped working, I got an error message after entering my credentials and clicking the "I am a human" checkbox on the popup Cloudflare captcha.
Once I disabled Web Archives, login started to work again.
Mind you, this test was done with uBO and PB still being disabled.Developer response
posted 7 months agoI don't see how this extension could break your login page, but if you'd open an issue on GitHub, we could debug the problem together by testing the same login page.
https://github.com/dessant/web-archives/issues - Rated 4 out of 5by dost, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by frostbyte, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19173586, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19114790, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18905802, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19145735, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19128233, 8 months ago