Reviews for Wappalyzer
Wappalyzer by Wappalyzer
Review by 御坂雲見
Rated 2 out of 5
by 御坂雲見, 2 years agoIt works, but costs me ~100MB memory at start and eventually ~800MB and I found this after using it for more than 2 years.
543 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19652246, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by jdk17, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Laurent FAVOLE, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19539434, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19184389, 8 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by taire, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19094638, 9 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by 洪金宝, 9 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Z403, 9 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by lyz, 10 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by 1123, 10 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Belco90, 10 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18971081, 10 months ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 18978736, 10 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18951864, 10 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by aden, 10 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18206992, 10 months agoFirefox 138.0.1 (64-bit) - Linux Flatpak. The extension doesn't work - "Installation aborted because the add-on appears to be corrupt"
- Rated 5 out of 5by taz, 10 months ago