Revisiones de Privacy Possum
Privacy Possum por cowlicks
421 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por The Beard Below My Chin, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14279693, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Zé Ribeiro, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 12370795, hace 8 añosCan you please say more about how your add-on is falsifying the data gathered by tracking companies. Does it modify any fingerprinting data?
If so is it compatible with the extension CanvasBlocker? Or does it do the same as CanvasBlocker.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 8 añosHi KIMW, there is a more in depth explanation about how blocking fingerprinting works here: https://github.com/cowlicks/privacypossum#browser-fingerprinting
Please let me know if you have any further questions after reading that. That way I can clarify documentation to avoid confusion in the future.
Privacy Possum *should* be compatible with with CanvasBlocker. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Édouard Lopez, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por LiaraTsoni, hace 8 añosTell me WHY are you using a UI library for display a couple of checkboxes ? What it will be the next time ? A virtual machine ? An add-on has to be light and efficient com'on.
UPDATE :
Thx for your reply, I understand. But I'm not talking about the code size. The size doesn't really matter, I'm just need a couple of bytes for doing a infinite loop. Using a library take more CPU and memory than vanilla. Using it one time isn't really a problem, but when you have five add-ons with five dependencies each... Grrrr ! Anyway you're doing a good job, thanks for your add-on.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 8 añosHi, thank you for your comment. I plan on using react later to expand the features the popup has. There have been quite a lot of requests for this. As well as an options page. I may switch to a smaller library in the future. Adding react also helped fix several UI bugs, and makes the current UI easier to build on.
FWIW, adding react only adds ~35kb to the packaged file, a %15 increase. Unpacked it is ~120kb. However the public suffix list, and multi-domain first party list combined are 160kb. So I didn't think it was a very significant size bump. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13230603, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14123273, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por sBRB4Q7, hace 8 añosThis is the best anti-tracking addon! The developer is fast and responsive.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13828166, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14248841, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13404270, hace 8 añosHello, can we use the extension in addition to "Privacy badger" and "ublock origin" and "disconnect"?
Edit: Thank =)Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 8 añosThanks for the review! To answer the question: yes! Please let me know if you have any questions. - Se valoró con 4 de 5por JxReach, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13489523, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por nir94, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14243006, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Alberto T. Gomez, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14239461, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Jon, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13746467, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14224752, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14211116, hace 8 añosThe add-on is good, accomplishes the essential as privacy.
The only inconvenience that it does not protect me from the fingerprint tracking.
I did two online tests(Am I unique?, Panopticlick EFF) with the extension enabled, and in both of them my test result was positive.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 8 añosTL;DR Panopticlick and Am I Unique use a homerolled assortment of tracking code that is impractical for commercial tracking.
I'll go into a little detail about Panopticlick to explain more. Panopticlick uses a deployment of the open source fingerprinting tool Fingerprintjs2, along with their own unique fingerprinting code.
I added some debug code and visited Panopticlick I see Privacy Possum detects the page accessing 12 API's that are marked for watching for fingerprinting. Except this is split over 3 different scripts:
https://panopticlick.eff.org/static/fp2.js
https://panopticlick.eff.org/static/fetch_whorls.js
https://panopticlick.eff.org/static/deployJava.js
Privacy watches for fingerprinting on *per script basis*, this is a reasonable assumption because, normally a websites tracking code is bundled into one place, so that the tracking info can be easily aggregated and used. I'm not aware of a real deployment where tracking is split up like this. It is practical for panopticlick (and Am I Unique) because they want to present information about your tracking independently, and manage the code to do that in a more practical way.
For a demonstration of the fingerprinting detection code, I usually point folks to:
http://valve.github.io/fingerprintjs2/
I think it is worth considering cases like Panopticlick, or Am I Unique, because they can be used to evade PP's novel detection. But I have not seen a case like this in the wild. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por josefmax, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por UNOwen, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14201010, hace 8 años