Revisiones de Stylish - Custom themes for any website
Stylish - Custom themes for any website por userstyles.org
495 revisiones
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14583644, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por TwoCables, hace 8 añosThis is my first time trying Stylish in Firefox Quantum. I expected the same full-screen experience that I've been enjoying in older versions of Firefox. Instead, I had about 15% of full-screen to use. So, this sucks. I'm not going to spend hours writing code in a tiny box. Are you kidding me? I'll avoid Stylish in Firefox Quantum. Good lord.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por RevMrSubG3N3, hace 8 añosI have facebook and twitter blocked and using a VPN, so your site userstyles.org isn't usable. Lame. If I can't even see the styles available because I don't need to use your friends hackshack make you no better. Hackshack is what you are until you let up on the snooping. There is a difference in functional access and being a jerk. I will quit being lazy and write my own CSS thank you for the fun we had, goodbye until your site is usable without opening up my soul
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por e_g1gor, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Nico, hace 8 añosSypware die eure Daten gesammelt hat und wohl möglich auch weiterhin sammelt. "Stylus" ist die gute Alternative
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Rock, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Anonymous user 4b32c7, hace 8 añosThis is not the same old stylish. It's something new and grotesque, the userstyles page is filled with ads.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14077053, hace 8 añosStylish is back but is still spyware: https://robertheaton.com/2018/08/16/stylish-is-back-and-you-still-shouldnt-use-it/
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Jason S, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13680229, hace 8 añosIt's spyware nowadays, use alternative like Stylus for the same functionality.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 12974221, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por 76292, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13388410, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14366391, hace 8 añosThe review below mine made by @riversiderepeat says is true to an extent -- Stylish is indeed a spyware, but Stylus IS NOT. They (the user that made the comment) clearly put 0 (as in none) effort into researching the add-on, looking at the source code, reading the wiki page, or really just looking at forum posts and/or articles all over the web about Stylus and why it exists -- which is very ignorant on their end.
What Stylish is doing here is very malicious and to see it being brought back to AMO is a disgrace. Mozilla, is this the way you fight for the privacy of your users -- by letting some 3rd party companies steal the data of your users?
By bringing back the add-on to the AMO with all the spyware inside of it, which is just one single click away and people get NO warnings about the seriousness of the data they're going to be giving out for a feature that's used once in a while and never again, is seriously disappointing. Sigh.
To Stylish developers, shame on you guys and congratulations on destroying one of the most amazing add-ons that were ever created as well as the USo, the forum, and everything in between. The add-on became a disappointment once it was sold out the first, and especially even more so when it got sold the second time. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14361122, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13119159, hace 8 añosYeah. Spyware and a resource hog. AND FOR THOSE WHO ARE TELLING EVERYONE TO USE STYLUS INSTEAD, THEY ARE THE SAME COMPANY SO DON'T USE THAT EITHER!! Mozilla should be ashamed letting crap like this go on under their watch. Can't trust anyone anymore!!
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Marsu42, hace 8 añosSince a better addon "Stylus" exists, this legacy "Stylish" version is only giving away your complete browsing history to a commercial and dubious 3rd party in exchange for sweets.
At first sight, it might conform to Mozilla's "no surprises" policy as the little cartoon doggie clearly begs for all urls. But it's not necessary, and the comfy link to userstyles is obviously just for grabbing your privcate data. Proof ist that there seems to be no way to manually check only for sites you actually would like a style for.
A lot of users will still use it because it's a well-known name and has been reviewed a lot in the good ol' days. Mozilla has a real problem with addons changing their policy for the worse. Avoid at all costs and use the alternative addon Stylus. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Bonaparte, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13818406, hace 8 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Dmitresso, hace 8 años