Revisiones de Tab Stash
Tab Stash por Josh Berry
475 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por mio, hace 7 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13978806, hace 8 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19188203, hace 9 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por AEZ314, hace 9 mesesI'm in love with this extension! Would love to see it on Chrome based browsers too (please port it, I desperately need it lol)
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 9 mesesThanks, I'm really happy you like it! A Chrome port is unfortunately very unlikely, because Tab Stash uses a lot of Firefox-specific things. Also, I am not a Chrome user, so wouldn't be able to provide good support for it. But it may happen one day, I won't say "never". :) Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 9 mesesThanks, I'm happy to hear you've found it useful!- Se valoró con 5 de 5por frostbyte, hace 9 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por STAR CRIMSON, hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Aoshi Shinomori, hace 10 mesesI've been a Firefox user since ver. 2 and this is my very first extension review. It's an essential complement to get your bazillion tabs back after an unexpected error or closing the wrong window. Simple and easy to use, thanks Josh!
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 10 mesesYou're quite welcome! I'm glad you like it. Thanks for the review, I'm honored to be your first. :) - Se valoró con 5 de 5por fizzxz, hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por DD, hace 10 mesesI hope I could have found this sooner! I got rid of other browsers for this. Now I can have my tabs backed up without worrying to lose them. So I can watch my content whenever I can. Totally worth it!
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 10 mesesI'm really glad to hear you like it! Thanks for the review! - Se valoró con 5 de 5por cehem, hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por BasalComet92836, hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16643877, hace 10 mesesThe best tab organizer on the firefox.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19010334, hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Davi, hace un añoAmazing add-on ! I've found just what I was looking for a long time ! It's a perfect substitute for "Pocket" or "Read it later" add-ons ! And all the tabs are synchronized between devices through bookmarks sync of Firefox !
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 10 mesesI'm glad to hear you like it, thanks for the review! - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Bullfinch, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Hahn, hace un añoAbsolutely a crazy good addon that is surely the killer feature of Firefox. I am so amazed how quickly and smoothly this addon can manage 1200+ groups and 36000+ tabs across 20 devices. It's simply unbelievable. Thank you so much for this great addon. Great softwares truly can change people's life in such a positive way.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace un añoYou're very welcome, I'm really glad to hear Tab Stash has been helpful! I'm also happy to hear it's performing well for you; that's something I try to pay close attention to. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18997982, hace un añoPlease add flag to create with old folder name when search is active instead of the search terms
>edit
Instead of whatever is typed in search , i would like the option for folder names to be created as in Version 3.1.1
Search terms as folder names are too contitional , restrictive to work without affecting stash organization even more when having to manage numerous diverse tabs
The search terms can be regex , random , short , ever changing etc ; they ignore the how often a new folder is created that can be set in the addon options when the search term is changed ; selecting and chosing to create a new folder will just do the same and can lead to duplicate folders if the search terms remains the same , at least in this case the folder names with 3.1.1 format would not be identical ; now if technically speaking the search term would check not only the topmost folder in the stash root but check all top folders (not sub folders) then it would just stash in a old folder where in this case the outcome wouldn't be desired so theres no avoiding this issue
3.1.1 naming format didn't had those downsides and was simple to work withRespuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace un añoI'd like to better-understand why this is causing you problems; feel free to open an issue on GitHub and we can discuss from there! - Se valoró con 5 de 5por AndrewKR, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por dodmedium, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18987877, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por pine, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por I'veTriedAllTheAddons, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16030867, hace un añoVery intuitive, works like i expected