Critiques pour Enhancer for YouTube™
Enhancer for YouTube™ par Max RF
12 384 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Arshaad AK Khan, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Thomas Lefort, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18286559 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansThere's just so much respect to be given to a random person on the Internet who just does the right thing and you are definetly one of them. Thank you so much for the possibility of using your App.
- Noté 4 sur 5par Cats, il y a 2 ansWorks great, I do have an issue when using multiple YouTube tabs, only the first YouTube tab loaded has the Enhancer activate, the others don't get any of the benefits of it.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18262204 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18361306 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Wail, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Themer, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16530291 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par jtr, il y a 2 ansLove the extension, does a lot of stuff that enhances my YouTube experience. So thanks for whatever led to that point.
Here comes the "But - instead of shying away people blatantly that are coming to your website with this:
"To get in touch with me send your message directly to webmaster@mrfdev.com and if you're lucky you'll get a reply.
Don't send feature requests, I ain't got time to implement new features."
These people are trying to help you with ideas of new features, which will make your work even more renowned. So turn the approach around. Give the possibility to donate 5 bucks and by that give me the chance for a submission. Nipping ideas in the bud is the wrong mindset. - Noté 3 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12458952 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansGreat enhancement suite for youtube, but please keep the users for Firefox forks in mind and make it so it can be used in FF ESR based forks for longer :)
- Noté 5 sur 5par mario, il y a 2 ansAmazing, makes the experience with YouTube much better. Especially the shortcuts.
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14638703 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15182899 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans"open in a new tab"- automatic screen expansion does not work when I'm log in. When I'm log out then i it's no problem.
- Noté 5 sur 5par fmo777, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16792828 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par stevenF, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16069018 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13450748 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansExcellent, using this extension for years now! Great features "boost volume" and video speed at the top!
- Noté 5 sur 5par robsku, il y a 2 ansFile encodings
bat natively supports UTF-8 as well as UTF-16. For every other file encoding, you may need to convert to UTF-8 first because the encodings can typically not be auto-detected. You can iconv to do so. Example: if you have a PHP file in Latin-1 (ISO-8859-1) encoding, you can call:
iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 my-file.php | bat
Note: you might have to use the -l/--language option if the syntax can not be auto-detected by bat.
Thank you for continuing! Since the add-on newer stopped working correctly on my oldest CentOS 7 Linux laptop, which I use to watch most YT at home, I didn't know whether it would work on newer FireFox versions… And I emailed you, asking for a copy of the .XPI file for personal use, as my latest ThinkPad didn't get it via Sync, because it was removed from here…
Then a couple of days ago, I noticed I suddenly had it installed on this… Funny thing, the old laptop says when visiting this page that the latest version requires later FireFox, but CentOS is a dead distro (except for some security updates); during the last month or so, I did run full package upgrades, and FireFox was included, but I doubt it was that much newer, but rather just some bugfixes… Yeah, it's 115.8.0esr (64-bit) Mozilla Firefox for Fedora (CentOS served as testing bed for Fedora), while this newest one has 124.0 (64-bit)…
So I think I would have to install the newer version manually past the package management (or try to build the latest Fedora source RPM to CentOS 7 — along with any dependencies, without breaking it) to get the latest version of this add-on. But it still works great on that version, so for now I don't feel it's worth the time…
I never saw you reply to my request… but my mailbox is too full, I got so much spam and other unwanted mail that I'm having a hard time keeping up with it… So I also tried to search how could I copy the installed extension from another profile (on another system, but that's not important) into another… I could have, of course just backed up my .mozilla/firefox/ folder, and tried my best, that way I could have got it back at any time…
But THANK YOU SO MUCH for making a new version available… Just one request: Please keep older, or at least the latest version available — either here with warning, or simply on your homepage with a big clear warning that it's at one's own risk to try it, and if it doesn't work, you warned them. There might always be cases where people want them anyway… And may get them working. <3 - Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12454883 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17302072 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansI am *very, very, very* glad that the developer is continuing to support this extension. Probably the most indispensable tool I have installed in my browser