Critiques pour Correcteur de texte - LanguageTool
Correcteur de texte - LanguageTool par LanguageTooler GmbH
65 notes
- Noté 2 sur 5par Robin Métral, il y a 4 ansThe LanguageTool spell checker APIs are great, but I'm disappointed by the addon:
- adds a lot of noise in dev tools: data attributes, lots of opaque event listeners, dozens of CSS variables.
- I don't need constant nudges to upgrade to premium—I'll do it if I'm happy with the default version.
- the source on GitHub is outdated—where can I find the source for the new addon?Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 4 ansThe add-on has to access the internals of each page to render errors, thus a lot of stuff shows up in the dev tools. The source of the add-on isn't publicly available. - Noté 2 sur 5par yankee, il y a 4 ansKind of a useless addon... it takes you to a website where you can see the errors but it does not clearly show the correct spelling of those words.
It is far quicker just to use another service such as google.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 4 ansOur add-on underlines errors in the textarea where you type. It works on almost any website, but not on addons.mozilla.org because Firefox has turned off all add-ons here. - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17088557 de Firefox, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 2 sur 5par Benyamin Limanto, il y a 5 ansSadly no Indonesian, Javanese, and Balinese language option in this spell checker extension.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Delboy666, il y a 5 ansThis used to work brilliantly. However, it now only highlights grammar and spelling mistakes as clicking on suggestions no longer replaces the misspelled word or corrects the grammar.
I have removed and re-installed twice to try and fix this fault to no avail.
It is now of minimal use.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 5 ansSorry you're having issues, but you are the only one reporting this so far. The problem might be with other add-ons installed, you should try to temporarily deactivate them. - Noté 2 sur 5par Adelino Jose Rodrigues Soares de Mello, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16513937 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansPour faire un test j'ai écrit une phrase contenant 6 fautes d'orthographe, et le correcteur ne m'en a signalé que 3, pour une note de 50%. Plutôt inutile!
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 6 ansPlease post specific examples, it's impossible for us to improve LanguageTool without that. Also, LanguageTool is not optimized to detect errors that people add on purpose - these are typically different from the errors that people actually make. - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15374389 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansRefuses to work no matter what I do. I have tried Restart Firefox, delete and reinstall the extension, Delete the extension then uninstall Firefox then reinstall Firefox then the extension. Nothing worked.
- Noté 2 sur 5par miguelk, il y a 7 ansI don't get it. In basic mode the ad-don does nothing. Right click on selected text opens new tab with misspelled word highlighted. And that's it. The misspelled word never gets replaced...and it shouldn't open a new tab either...as it is, it's useless. Please advise. Thank you...
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansThe add-on underlines errors while typing. That works on almost any site, except addons.mozilla.org, Chrome Webstore and Google Docs and very few others. If it doesn't work for you, please contact me at the address given at https://languagetool.org/legal/, specifying the website where it doesn't work. Using the context menu to open a new tab is meant for static texts, not for texts you have written into a text area. - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15007240 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansAbsolutely fantastic piece of software, except for when it stops working entirely to push you an incredibly unsubtle ad for their premium service.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansThe basic (non-premium) checks always work, we're not aware of a single case where the premium ad made the basic checks stop. Please post details on how to reproduce to either https://forum.languagetool.org/ or contact us directly at https://languagetool.org/legal/ - Noté 2 sur 5par Mrowa378, il y a 8 ansThis addon is good but has some disadvantages burdens the operation of the browser and so websites, :-( while I would like such problems with this extension was not and I hope that over time it will change for the better by making another very large update : - )
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansWe have released version 2.0.25 which improves performance a lot - could you try with that? - Noté 2 sur 5par sinekonata, il y a 8 ansIt is barely more useful than the default spell checker. What I wanted from this is an auto-detect for auto-switching languages. It hasn't implemented it. It also doesn't show the squiggly lines and is quite buggy.
But above all, it uploads every keystroke to its corporate servers... So... uninstall immediately, how bloated and intrusive is that? No thank you, either take all the code to the client add-on or don't make a spelling add-on at all....Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 8 ansThe server component is more than 100MB large plus a few GB of data, I wonder how we should put that into the add-on? Also, if you're concerned about privacy, why don't you install the server locally? It's all documented under "Offline use". - Noté 2 sur 5par Anonymous, il y a 9 ansGenerally a good extension, but unfortunately not available for Android.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 11233054 de Firefox, il y a 9 ansI write:
El niño esta en la guarderia
LanguageTool corrects me:
El niño esta en la guardería
The right thing is:
El niño está en la guardería
other,
I write:
eso esta echo
LanguageTool:
eso esta echo
The right thing is:
Eso está hecho
In Spanish the extension is still green, but it is a good idea Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 9 ansWe have now clarified the privacy policy: storing data is *extremely* rare. Even then, only the single sentence that caused an issue is stored. And even then, we don't store an IP address. Storing data in these rare cases is the only way for us to fix very rare bugs, as users just don't report bugs most of the time.