I really like this addon, it's a nice intermediate to what I really want: concurrently running sandboxed accounts. Lately, however, it appears to be a bit broken. When I open a link from an email in Google Inbox ("Fun" container), that should end up in a new container (e.g. "Finance"), the new tab closes immediately, and I'm forced to right click to open the new link. This stinks.

When working with multiple Microsoft/Azure accounts for different customers/tennants, I can now stop using In-Private windows all the time and just make sure I access the resources from the right container.

I love the concept! It's private, easy to use, and should be BUILT IN to Firefox! I just wish you could add more icons, each container has it's own individual history, passwords, etc. Also, when I sort the tabs, it moves the new tab button to the left, and I can't change it back, which is annoying. What would be nice is if I didn't have to open a new tab in a container by having to go to the container menu. If it would be right next to the new tab button, where everyone would see it would be awesome. Overall, great!

It does what it's say, and in a smoothly way.
Really useful.

This should in fact be part of Firefox by default! Most useful IMO is the option to automatically assign a default container to a website so the same site will always be opened in this specific container. Good for privacy and separating business from personal sites and such.

Make easy to use multiple accounts

Inestimable ! Pour gérer plusieurs comptes Twitter, c'est indispensable.

Useful for keeping cookies separate. Would be nice to keep add-on's and their data separate too. For example, MetaMask should only be enabled in its own container.

This is a fantastic, must have, addon. Should ship with Firefox by default.
One thing that I'd like to see is being able to see the menu by right clicking the tab itself. It would solve the issue with some sites which disallow the right-click (e.g.: Google Drive)

Slightly disappointed. I hoped for different privacy settings for containers (like cookies policy at least). Now it just deletes all my cookies through all containers after closing my browser.
And would be nice to have the different addons set for each container.
I still need few browsers to solve this.

Awesome! 5-stars if I could easily take an existing tab and swap/copy/move/duplicate it into a different container (right now I have to copy URL, open new tab with different container, paste and go ... blech). Other people have asked, adding my vote!

Just add sync and open a new uncontained tab as a container and it will be close to perfection!

Every time I close and open the browser, tabs are reset to some state that was a couple of months ago. It does not restore the tabs and containers that were open when I closed the browser.

Fantastically helpful!

Would be nice to be able to move tabs over to a specific container and also be able to edit the list of domains in a container.

I have Samsung j16 (firefox 57.0.4) but says incompatible platform
But this page says it should be compatible
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/versions

le veo futuro, pero deberia tener una opcion para abrir container por defectos y un atajo para abrir container en el grupo que deseas.

This is — quite honestly — the greatest thing that has happened on the internet since The Fappening.

awe e ma e

Everything is fine. I use it everyday. Before firefox containers I was need to use chromium for job tasks, but nowadays I use only Firefox and split personal and job tasks in different containers. I am happy about that.
Many thanks to developers team.

I absolutely love containers! They help immensely with web development and having multiple test accounts. No more private windows and using both Chrome and Firefox just to test more than 2 accounts at a time!

This add-on is useful for memory management and organizing the endless collection of tabs I seem to keep open.

I look forward to how the developers can make these easier to use and organize. Certain aspects about the implementation feel clunky to me, but the need is real.

Excellent, maybe is a bit paranoid if you think of it, but works