Critiques pour Nano Defender for Firefox
Nano Defender for Firefox par LiCybora
146 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par HardKoreG, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par eriador, il y a 7 ansTruly excellent. I've been using the unofficial ND from github for months with uBlock and it works great. Very pleased to see it now on AMO... Thanks for porting to Firefox!
- Noté 5 sur 5par Will, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Valmont, il y a 7 ansOk, I have enough of it (of getting this to work). It looked like the devs fixed it, but here's the issue:
Installed Nano Defender and Nano Adblocker to keep it simple. Both from AMO. Doesn't work on certain websites though. For example for imgView.net, https://imgrock.pw/ , https://imgtown.pw and so forth.
Tried the quick issue submitter, but it gave me a hard time. It said the issue is fixed. Maybe it was, but it's not anymore. So I was required to go to Github. Little bit too nerdy for me. Spent half an hour just to find a unused username to sign up.
I did try to add the issue, but I did it wrong and I can't be bothered to "study" how to report an issue. You almost need a license just to be able to report something. I'm happy with simply being an end-user.
Two stars for the effort because I don't like 1 star. But right now it hasn't been a success for me.
Edit: added a star because it looks like the devs are really trying. This is a toughie though.
Edit 2: added another star (to 4) because it does a good job overall.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansThe reason we need multiple information because we cannot reproduce issue for those sites. Therefore we ask for step to reproduce, screenshot and console in order to know what's wrong. Although it is complicated for reporters, those are required or we cannot fix without knowing the cause.
Even though your issue being closed as invalid, you can still modify your issue. Once your issue can be reproduced, your issue will be re-considered (this time I edit for you for your reference).
Edit: Your issue is confirmed and we are working on your issue right now. Please wait for next version for fix. - Noté 5 sur 5par ziggy, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par kranazoli[HUN], il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Hitomi, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par BALTAGY, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14859106 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14836706 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Tan, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14791975 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14780594 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Sageru, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par ky0k4su1g3tsu, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Cincin Masuk Mangkok, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14072894 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansFor who complain about its invasive permissions: well... That's what essentially make out of a blocker. What you can do is just to choose appropriate developers to trust.
- Noté 5 sur 5par winwinner, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14733392 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13846949 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14722554 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14719299 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Leonardo, il y a 7 ans