Critiques pour Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes par Shinigami Eyes
1 427 notes
- Noté 2 sur 5par Skye, il y a un anTwo stars, as I did use the app for years and found much usage out of it until recently. I appreciate the concept and it did help me filter out transphobic sources, but recently, the extension has been horribly mismanaged and the criteria for marking someone as anti-trans seems to be poorly monitored.
I've also seen explicitly trans-friendly sources get rejected from inclusion in the extension - such as the YouTube channel Two Hot Takes, who have openly voiced their support for transgender people across multiple videos. I have reviewed the criteria for submitting labels multiple times and I have yet to find anything from this channel that would disqualify them from being marked as trans-friendly. This is far from the only example, but one worth bringing up nonetheless.
Updates in recent years do not take into account the needs of the wider trans/nonbinary community. When I first installed this extension around 2018, it was very explicitly inclusive of the wider community, but no longer seems to acknowledge nonbinary and intersex voices. Devs have not properly acknowledged concerns from many users regarding the extension's safety. - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18997387 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Himisuda, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par raven, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18734000 de Firefox, il y a un anThis app has been invaluable to me as a transfem for avoiding unsafe people, including terfs, conservative transphobes, and even transmisogynists within the trans community (who happen to be engaging in targeted behavior towards this app). I like that it doesn't discriminate based on identity - if anyone engages in transmisogynist rhetoric, including trans women, they're marked red, as they should be.
- Noté 1 sur 5par TX, il y a un anShinigami Eyes Is Failing the Community It Was Meant to Protect
Shinigami Eyes is not being “review bombed.” It is being rightfully called out for perpetuating transphobia, intersexism, and internalized community bias. This extension, once a helpful tool for flagging transphobic or unsafe spaces, is now actively contributing to the very harm it was created to prevent.
Let me be clear: I love and support trans women and transfeminine people. My critique is not rooted in misogyny or transmisogyny, but in a commitment to the safety and dignity of all gender-expansive people—including transmascs, nonbinary people (often dismissively labeled as “theyfabs”), intersex individuals, and our allies.
Too many voices in our community are being silenced by this tool. Transmascs, nonbinary people, and intersex folks are being marked red—“unsafe”—not for any transphobic or bigoted behavior, but simply for speaking out about our lived experiences with oppression and systemic sexism. Meanwhile, accounts that promote violence against transmascs and men, deny nonbinary or intersex identities, or spread hate are still being marked green—“safe.”
This isn’t just individual bias. It’s systemic harm. It’s the erasure of marginalized voices within an already marginalized community. And it defeats the entire purpose of Shinigami Eyes.
To the developers and moderators: you must do better. Learn to recognize transmisogyny (sexism against trans women), transmisandry (sexism against trans men), exorsexism (sexism against nonbinary people), and intersexism (sexism against intersex people). These are real, harmful forces in our community. They deserve to be flagged—not shielded.
Trans women are valid. Trans men are valid. Trans nonbinary people are valid. Trans intersex people are valid. If your plug-in claims to protect gender-expansive people, then it must protect all of us.
Until then, I recommend uninstalling Shinigami Eyes—or, at the very least, disregarding the red and green tags and manually correcting false reports. As it currently functions, it no longer serves the community it once aimed to defend. - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18992879 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par monster-energy-guzzler-supreme, il y a un anapparently intersex people fucking existing is dangerous to trans people but terfs are just fine 💀💀💀💀💀
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18975238 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Chaim, il y a un anThis extension works as intended! Transmascs who post transmisogynistic content and who are angry about being called out are review-bombing.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18991084 de Firefox, il y a un anTransmisogynistic transmascs rlly hate when you point out they're being transmisogynistic! This extension is working as intended ^_^
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17842059 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18987260 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par TertiaryNemo, il y a un anI wish I wasn't having to write this review, but the recent trend in this extension's highlights is pretty clear. It's no longer reliable and frequently flags explicitly pro-LGBT sources/sites as red and notably TERF-y sources as green. Terrible loss for anyone who used it in years past.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18987003 de Firefox, il y a un anUsed to be a great tool, but now it's just used by the people who run it to flag people who disagree with what being trans "should" look like- such as targeting trans men who speak out about their experiences instead of shutting up and suffering in silence.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18986051 de Firefox, il y a un anI personally think its fine despite the suspicious review bombing lol
- Noté 1 sur 5par toohehimforthem, il y a un anThis app was one I used to use all the time, Particularly on sites like YouTube and such where I didn't want to give advertising money to transphobes. However, this app is now being used as a weapon for lateral aggression by people who want to erase trans men and our experiences, and I can no longer support it in good conscience until something is fixed. Trans men get flagged red for talking about the transphobia we face as men, because people don't like it when marginalized people mention situations where intersectional struggles seem to erase (often conditional in these specific cases and that's why it is able to be taken away) privilege, and that isn't okay.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Sarah, il y a un anReally useful way to be warned about transphobes online. Most of the negative reviews are from people who'd rather review-bomb the extension than reflect on the way they treat trans women.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Arboth, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par nanuen, il y a un an
- Noté 4 sur 5par ZJustice, il y a un anworks fine. not foolproof, but broadly its perfectly functional. very rarely have i seen somebody marked red where they shouldn't be - the reverse IS more common though. I pay way more attention to red markings than green ones as a result. many negative reviews are because people forget it's possible to be trans and transphobic at the same time, and that you can contest false markings if you see fit.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18969773 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Usually the Butz, il y a un anI do not recommend. It marks outright TERFs and radfems as green, and transmascs/men, nonbinary people, and intersex people as red.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16602695 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par PlaqueRat, il y a un an