Critiques pour Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes par Shinigami Eyes
867 notes
- Noté 1 sur 5par yyupo, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Pablo, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Meow, il y a 2 ansHi, I'm transfemme. "Theyfab" is an anti-trans slur and we should not play into patriarchal transmisia by not treating it as such. I'll change my review if you fix this. I'm friends with many people affected by this slur and it's silly and divisive to not treat it as such. Trans people don't all hate each other because we came from different backgrounds and have different genders- that's just overemphasized internet drama, not real life. I gave all my old masculine clothes to a friend affected by this slur, and I don't feel comfortable not treating it as a slur. A word that bioessentializes someone's AGAB as their gender is absolutely the definition of transphobia and constitutes a slur. This is like basic transfeminism 101.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Crunk, il y a 2 ansmade a guide to say its okay to use a slur that misgenders enby people, good job everyone /s
- Noté 1 sur 5par Hee-Ho-Kun, il y a 2 ansThe moderators have begun marking trans people as transphobic for specific stances on intra-community issues; this extension is now useless because of that.
- Noté 1 sur 5par KozaBerserker, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par parallax77, il y a 2 ansunreliable these days since a lot of people are getting marked red despite being very trans-positive or even previously marked green, and a lot of random people suddenly turning green despite not meeting any requirements. moderation should step up imo.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17022614 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansat one point it seemed decently reliable, but i just saw the entire wikipedia dot org article for okra - yes the plant/food - flagged as transphobic so i uhhh. i have very VERY serious doubts about how well moderated (if at all) the submissions are anymore
- Noté 1 sur 5par ol, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par crgzero, il y a 2 ansNot accurate and relies on feelings instead of facts, what one person thinks is fine another will freak out over. Reviews can't be fact based on something that doesn't rely on facts.
- Noté 1 sur 5par AJ167, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par anettka, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Scoobysnak, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15176908 de Firefox, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par KaptainCnucklz, il y a 3 ansUnless they implement a feature to see what post/reasoning was used to justify the red label, and importantly with sources, then this is only going to be a hindrance to have installed if you want to find non-bigoted people. It's wrong worryingly often.
Unless you talk exclusively about issues relevant to transfemmes, then you're marked as transphobic. They're also way too quick to flag transfemmes as green just for simply being trans, often transmedicalists (aka people who think you're only "allowed" to be called trans if you get full gender affirming care, with all the gender affirming surgeries + HRT) will slip through and be green.
Likely that the people controlling it have serious biases against transmasc and enby people. That or the extension is entirely unmoderated, and has become compromised by automation/people doing false marks. - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18066063 de Firefox, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par MirioMan, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par herr, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par bleh, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18026876 de Firefox, il y a 3 ansit is hardly ever accurate and mainly boils down to things the creators just disagree with
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17366374 de Firefox, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17863225 de Firefox, il y a 3 ansI still use it because it's the only option out there. Maybe one day it will get better and I'll change my rating back to 5 stars that it used to deserve
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17823267 de Firefox, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Bong13, il y a 4 ans