Critiques pour Stylish - Custom themes for any website
Stylish - Custom themes for any website par userstyles.org
976 notes
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12890780 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13792258 de Firefox, il y a 8 anshttps://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
- Noté 1 sur 5par Ricky, il y a 8 anshttps://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
This add-on is spyware. Stylus replicates its functionality and doesn't steal your browsing history. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/styl-us/ - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14135656 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansNo thanks. I don't need an extension that sniffs my data.
- Noté 1 sur 5par media-picker, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13013082 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14135570 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Audrian, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par WarnerJan Veldhuis, il y a 8 ansStay away from this extension. Stylish collects EVERYTHING the user does and sends it to their servers. See https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/ for a breakdown and more information. This add-on needs to be pulled as soon as possible!
- Noté 1 sur 5par Nick K, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14135499 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansStylish collects and transmits all your browsing behavior over the internet in order to analyze and sell this data. Have a look at 'Stylus' which is a fork of stylish without the invasive privacy infringements.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14135493 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par thm | Tomáš Mládek, il y a 8 anshttps://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
- Noté 1 sur 5par mDfRg, il y a 8 ansAccording to this:
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/software/2-million-users-impacted-by-new-data-collection-policy-in-stylish-browser-add-on/
https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
https://www.ghacks.net/2017/05/16/stylus-is-a-stylish-fork-without-analytics/
this plugin tracks your internet traffic. This cannot be tolerated - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13444090 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansAccording to this article the Stylish browser extension violates your privacy by sending your browser history to foreign servers
https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
This cannot be tolerated and breaks trust. No more Stylish for me. - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14135331 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Matthias Winkelmann, il y a 8 ansSpyware!. Records every keystroke, every website visited, and sends it to their server: https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14131561 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Cyberknight, il y a 8 ansFor all those complaining that Stylish stopped working on FF 61: Mozilla (again) broke up things. "-moz-document" (which never left the "experimental" status) is now blocked to work on remote URL, i.e., it's useless now. Just remove the "-moz-document" lines from the scripts and they will start working again. About the URL restrictions, now Stylish requires the addresses to be input in a specific field on the bottom of the script editing Page. Of course, incorporating "-moz-document" in the script was much easier, dozens of domains could be filtered at once. Now, they have to be entered one by one. On the plus side, Stylish still has the same flexibility regarding domain definitions, including regex rules! On the plus-plus side, it doesn't depend on Mozilla's moods anymore...
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 8 ansThanks Cyberknight! We'll try to upload a fix soon with the 'moz-document' removed by default, as we have it on Chrome. Our Chrome users have been using the 'Specify' field for domains, for quite a while now. As you've mentioned, the regxp pretty much gives you the same flexibly that the moz-document does, without the dependency on FF's changes. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13595994 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansHere's the solution to FF 61.0.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51101566/unknown-rule-moz-document-for-stylish-in-firefox-61