Beoardielingen foar 'Improve YouTube!' 🎧 (For YouTube & Video)
'Improve YouTube!' 🎧 (For YouTube & Video) troch code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
78 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch DOT, 10 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19242234, 10 moannen lynThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.Antwurd ûntwikkeler
9 moannen lyn pleatstHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We could also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own). - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Beeg, ien jier lyncool addon but how do I block certain channel? I don't see any button to do that.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Thraug, ien jier lynCan't make it block shorts or playables, which is all I want the extension to do. I have every option enabled to block shorts and they still appear on YouTube mobile in my browser. What am I doing wrong?
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 12474497, ien jier lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Foxy_Chipher, ien jier lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Devin Rozsas, ien jier lynThe main reason I wanted this extension was to make YouTube stop spamming already watched videos, random playlists and useless shorts.
1) It doesn't block already watched videos, it just makes them less visible by hiding the thumbnail and dimming their links;
2) Sometimes it marks random videos as watched, but I never even clicked their links, even less watched them;
3) It cannot block playlists, as far as I've used it;
4) It blocks shorts successfully AND entirely (not just dim their links), which is good.
Update 23/Feb/2026: It's worse now. The button to hide videos won't even show up. I enabled it, restarted Firefox, and still not there.Antwurd ûntwikkeler
ien jier lyn pleatstPlease join us on github. (Firefox Addon Reviews are not intended for bug reports BTW.)
Thank you! :) Antwurd ûntwikkeler
ien jier lyn pleatstIt works on www.youtube.com! (And we can add m.youtube.com anytime)- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch noraef, ien jier lynVery slow (even by youtube standards), whatever what the dev will say: sometimes takes almost a minute to load a youtube video, and often will fail to load the full page, with the comments.
Very buggy: again, often failing to load a page fully, the mini-player suddenly not appearing anymore when scrolling down, or among many others, the limiting to H.264 not working reliably (to be fair, it only reliably works with enhanced-h264ify, whichever main youtube extension I use). Even the menu is buggy: the search bar will always cover the link to go back in the menu (so one has to close that search bar again and again), and if used in the extension panel (as opposed to using it pinned), it won't even fit the window properly, lol!
Fortunately, I discovered a little used extension (Tweaks for youtube: only about 3k users, which is baffling), that is great where Improve youtube isn't at all. I tested them all, and that's the only one I'll keep. - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18744881, ien jier lynwas working for a period of time but in the last month any settings used would lag youtube; back button and pause taking forever.
removed extension and youtube stared working again, unfortunate as it was a good addition :/Antwurd ûntwikkeler
ien jier lyn pleatsthi! :) please don't rate us wrongfully but mind this doesn't start or end with your usage. This is a hardworking volunteer initiative since 12 years, with 150 contributors on github, and inspite we modestly have to race uphill all them time during Youtube changes.
Please don't buy or spread baseless rumors about lags. (Every software will take some time (lke 0.001 second). We changed nothing mad a minor visual update 10 days ago, none in November Antwurd ûntwikkeler
2 jierren lyn pleatstSince when and how exactly? please join us on Github for a bug report if you can. (Also Firefox reviews are not meant for single feature bug reports. You aren't supposed to vote us down like this) thanks- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Islam Nurmagomedov, 2 jierren lynThis extension makes YT lags as hell. I swear to God. I uninstalled it and it went back to normal.
Antwurd ûntwikkeler
2 jierren lyn pleatstNo! :) How come, just 2 hours before your comment, when i answered "💕", i felt it is predictable that it will make somebody try getting negative attention? - While this may be removed unless you edit/correct it, you can also do something that will earn positive. Kind regards - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Zharay, 2 jierren lynSick and tired of having features work then break then back again without any real explanation. Almost got to the point to which I was going to switch back to Chrome until I found the extension I was using there finally got ported to Firefox.
A valiant effort, but plagued by too many bugs. Antwurd ûntwikkeler
2 jierren lyn pleatstCheck again please. v4.1090. - Player features work, appearance features might not (because it is a different layout). BTW: reviews are not for specific bug reports or support, but are supposed to judge the product as a whole.- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Paul, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18468495, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13404543, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Jim, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Wagner, 2 jierren lynde fato nenhum supera o falecido youtube enhancer... esse até tinha boa proposta e algumas opções apesar de bem cru, mas o mais importante não cumpriu, que é bloquear o lixo cibernético (refiro a propagandas)
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18403538, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18401954, 2 jierren lynUw gegevens voor websites in het ‘genoemde’ domein benaderen
De extensie kan de inhoud van webpagina’s die u in het opgegeven domein bezoekt lezen, evenals gegevens die u in deze webpagina’s invoert, zoals gebruikersnamen en wachtwoorden. Antwurd ûntwikkeler
2 jierren lyn pleatsthi, known firefox bug with standard html {overflow-x: hidden !important; }
( https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues/1649 )
and we can just avoid it in all future version. Just didn't make it to top1 of my to-do list :/ Whew.