Beoardielingen foar Stylish - Custom themes for any website
Stylish - Custom themes for any website troch userstyles.org
978 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 12890780, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13792258, 8 jierren lynhttps://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Ricky, 8 jierren lynhttps://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
This add-on is spyware. Stylus replicates its functionality and doesn't steal your browsing history. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/styl-us/ - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14135656, 8 jierren lynNo thanks. I don't need an extension that sniffs my data.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch media-picker, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13013082, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14135570, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Audrian, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch WarnerJan Veldhuis, 8 jierren lynStay away from this extension. Stylish collects EVERYTHING the user does and sends it to their servers. See https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/ for a breakdown and more information. This add-on needs to be pulled as soon as possible!
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Nick K, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14135499, 8 jierren lynStylish collects and transmits all your browsing behavior over the internet in order to analyze and sell this data. Have a look at 'Stylus' which is a fork of stylish without the invasive privacy infringements.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14135493, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch thm | Tomáš Mládek, 8 jierren lynhttps://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch mDfRg, 8 jierren lynAccording to this:
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/software/2-million-users-impacted-by-new-data-collection-policy-in-stylish-browser-add-on/
https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
https://www.ghacks.net/2017/05/16/stylus-is-a-stylish-fork-without-analytics/
this plugin tracks your internet traffic. This cannot be tolerated - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13444090, 8 jierren lynAccording to this article the Stylish browser extension violates your privacy by sending your browser history to foreign servers
https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
This cannot be tolerated and breaks trust. No more Stylish for me. - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14135331, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Matthias Winkelmann, 8 jierren lynSpyware!. Records every keystroke, every website visited, and sends it to their server: https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14131561, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Cyberknight, 8 jierren lynFor all those complaining that Stylish stopped working on FF 61: Mozilla (again) broke up things. "-moz-document" (which never left the "experimental" status) is now blocked to work on remote URL, i.e., it's useless now. Just remove the "-moz-document" lines from the scripts and they will start working again. About the URL restrictions, now Stylish requires the addresses to be input in a specific field on the bottom of the script editing Page. Of course, incorporating "-moz-document" in the script was much easier, dozens of domains could be filtered at once. Now, they have to be entered one by one. On the plus side, Stylish still has the same flexibility regarding domain definitions, including regex rules! On the plus-plus side, it doesn't depend on Mozilla's moods anymore...
Antwurd ûntwikkeler
8 jierren lyn pleatstThanks Cyberknight! We'll try to upload a fix soon with the 'moz-document' removed by default, as we have it on Chrome. Our Chrome users have been using the 'Specify' field for domains, for quite a while now. As you've mentioned, the regxp pretty much gives you the same flexibly that the moz-document does, without the dependency on FF's changes.