Beoardielingen foar Video DownloadHelper
Video DownloadHelper troch vdh
5.222 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13680032, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13679838, 8 jierren lynDeze addon verschijnt niet in de werkbalk. Kan dus ook niet gebruikt worden. Jammer de vorige versies waren goed.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13679383, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13679247, 8 jierren lynDie neue Version verlangsamt den Computer derartig, dass man besser auf den Downloadhelper verzichtet. Schade, vorher war das ein hervorragendes Addon!
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13673780, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch akkirhakan, 8 jierren lynArtık çalışmıyor ve PC uygulaması indirmemizi istiyor. Sildim gitti.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13668259, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13667802, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch LacAbEla, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13664663, 8 jierren lynThe developer gives instructions that are supposed to work on other linux systems but after successfully installing and even restarting the computer, clicking on the download link prompts you to install the companion again. Waste of time. I trued on Fedora 26
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13659446, 8 jierren lynVerbraucht >75% meiner CPU und legt den Computer lahm, ich werde es wieder löschen.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 12792557, 8 jierren lynNot working any longer.Says companion app is needed.This extra step needed to possibly get it working again is just to much trouble so will look for something better.I will keep it around for a short time to see if this is fixed.In the meantime I will use something else.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13658037, 8 jierren lynIts nothing like it used to be. Whoever is responsible for current development should be ashamed of what he did to this plugin. Its useless and horribly unefficient unless you are willing to pay for full version. Authors even go as far as LYING when it comes reencoding whole video just to add some crappy watermark - it is called "sumowanie" on polish locale, which is basically BS compared to whats actually going on.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13657079, 8 jierren lynMost likely hit a paywall, but couldn't find a way around having my media downloaded with a watermark. Nothing more frustrating!
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13655197, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13654724, 8 jierren lynThis add-on is garbage! The interface is horrible and it requests that you download another free app to make it actually work. Now here's the kicker...you still have to PURCHASE a license agreement to convert files. Even just attempting to DL one video without converting it to a more usable format, IT FAILED! What a crock of shit! NEXT!
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13652482, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Joseph Short, 8 jierren lynWon't work on OpenSUSE (no .rpm for the other part). It might as well not exist for all the good it does me.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 12819739, 8 jierren lynIt doesn't allow users to specify the directory to download files.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13644900, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13647433, 8 jierren lynBonito "cacho código bidi" en parte superior izquierda durante "todo" el vídeo, ya podía estar un rato como el típico "ripeado por fulano", ni me he molestado en escanearlo.
Otros add-ons hacen lo mismo sin tener que instalar la "co-aplicación" esta, demasiadas complicaciones para el mismo resultado.
...desinstalando - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13620238, 8 jierren lynSo this is basically my response to this that I received from a "developer" in response to my first review:
"Have you ever thought that if you download with the companion app, there is no reason (and no possibility) to see the download in the browser download manager ? And that if you see incoming data, there is a video file created somewhere in your disk, like at the default download location of the add-on that you can configure through several ways.
I suggest you check the support forum https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!forum/video-downloadhelper-q-and-a"
To answer the question, yes, I considered, that. I rejected it as bad design. The download queue in your "add on" is jenky at best, hard to get to, and fussy as all hell. Firefox has a perfectly good download manager, I'd much rather see stuff there, like it used to be. If you have an issue with the new, but hardly improved Firefox API, then that's between you and Firefox.
Second, yes, I checked the default locations. I'm not quite as stupid as you seem to think. When I said it wasn't there, I meant it. It's not there. I'm not going to go hunting on the disk for a file that may have been created in some random place. If you did and and I caught you doing it, you'd have gotten an entirely different review the first time and you'd have been flagged as abusive.
I continue to search for a solution that works, but it sounds like you need to really embrace the new Firefox API and refactor the program rather than trying to make it work like it used to.