Tampermonkey에 대한 리뷰
Tampermonkey 제작자: Jan Biniok
리뷰 254개
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 14204696 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 14201632 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 14133171 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점alessandro 님, 8년 전this crappy extension destroy Firefox for Android back and forward cache function making the browser super slow stay away !
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 12905438 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 6208066 님, 8년 전Doesn't do anything. Even when enabled sites still detect ad-blocking and try to prevent it.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13937278 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13937217 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13808209 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Andrey Korzh 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13742023 님, 8년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13606670 님, 8년 전
- There are no obvious ways to actually install scripts, except copy-paste into editor (except File/Import on "Utilities" tab, which turns out to be for configuration rather than user scripts).
The support site doesn't quite work (has a frozen pop-up on top), but what shows gives Chrome specific instructions.개발자 답글
8년 전에 게시됨> There are no obvious ways to actually install scripts
Script installation works by loading URLs that end up on ".user.js". This can be done by clicking a link or manually entering the URL. You can also drag and drop files ending up on ".user.js" to Firefox. Finally you can use the "Utilities" tab, enter a URL at the "URL" section and click "Import".
> The support site doesn't quite work (has a frozen pop-up on top)
Do you have JavaScript blocked/disabled i.e. via NoScript?
> but what shows gives Chrome specific instructions
This is on my TODO list. However, many answers apply regardless of browser in use. - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13437159 님, 8년 전There is really no excuse for having one's addon obfuscated. In fact, Tampermonkey is the only addon I know of that deliberately obfuscates its code! That brings the question: what are the developers trying to hide and why?
If you don't want anybody else to fork your extension, just release it under a restrictive custom license, and everybody will be happy. There is no way somebody could abuse such a license and benefit from it. So we'll be looking forward to a release w/o deliberate obfuscation!개발자 답글
8년 전에 게시됨> That brings the question: what are the developers trying to hide and why?
Either there is nothing hidden besides the concrete implementation or neither the Mozilla Add-on review team, nor the Opera extension review team, nor the Windows Store team did their job.
> There is no way somebody could abuse such a license and benefit from it.
In a perfect world: yes. - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13434058 님, 9년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점jorge121valdes 님, 9년 전Whenever i do a change, i must wait like 5s until i can continue writing (this happens if i stop writing for like 1 second), it's imposible to make things with this lag, hate it totally
개발자 답글
9년 전에 게시됨Please try to disable the internal linter:
"Config mode" -> "Advanced" and then disable "Automatic syntax check on typing"
If this doesn't help you can also try to disable the option "Highlight trailing whitespace".
Config mode -> Advanced, - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13325508 님, 9년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13334636 님, 9년 전Doesn't work at all in the latest Firefox Beta for Android. Or Firefox for Android in general.
A shame, because it's flawless if executed in a desktop PC. - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 12960771 님, 9년 전