Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool에 대한 리뷰
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool 제작자: LanguageTooler GmbH
리뷰 622개
- 5점 만점에 1점funderburg 님, 25일 전Pulled the usual bait-and-switch requiring payment for it to work it all. Uninstalling.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13325943 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Matrix_Cracker 님, 한 달 전Sorry - this is the badest move you can make. Telling AI ist ramping up the costs ist really a bad one and -in two- really not true. There are a lot of good examples out there how it's done. Without harming privacy anyways. And the pricetag is much to high. As a user of the premium subscription this makes me cancel that subscription anyway, because I was in belive supporting all the free (Plug-In)-Users with the high pricetag to the desktop version.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 12303032 님, 한 달 전
- Jeez, forcing a premium subscription to use the extension. I switched over to this from grammarly because it became AI slop filled, but now this extension has done the same and is removing the free tier because of it. AI is expensive, harms the environment, and generally isn't worth the costs. Remove the AI features and return the free tier, you'll get way more users by doing that.
- Used to be good, considering the free tier. Now only for premium subscribers. The developers should explicitly state this information upfront in the first lines of the extension description, allowing users to avoid spending time installing it and then uninstalling it a couple of minutes later.
- 5점 만점에 1점toohehimforthem 님, 한 달 전Used to be free for a long time, but has started asking for a premium subscription just to use it at all. I'm disabled and was using it to spell check but I can't afford this. I guess its back to mixed up words now if I'm not having a very efficient day with fighting it.
- 5점 만점에 1점Clueingforbeggs 님, 한 달 전They got rid of their free tier, forcing users to pay for features they clearly do not want to use (and it's obvious they know this, because they're advertising it as an upgrade to premium, despite the fact that the cost of running premium is why they're doing this), just because those features were too expensive for the people who actually want to use them.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 20120274 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 20122884 님, 한 달 전Was good until it ask to pay to work (unless you want an extension that just say "use premium to use extension", so not "Some features may require payment" ...
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 20081746 님, 한 달 전Nie dość, że słabe to teraz jeszcze wymuszają premium, żeby w ogóle działało. Podziękuję za tę wątpliwą przyjemność.
- 5점 만점에 1점DONTBLAMEMEM8 님, 한 달 전