Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool에 대한 리뷰
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool 제작자: LanguageTooler GmbH
리뷰 5,360개
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 13325943 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Matrix_Cracker 님, 한 달 전Sorry - this is the badest move you can make. Telling AI ist ramping up the costs ist really a bad one and -in two- really not true. There are a lot of good examples out there how it's done. Without harming privacy anyways. And the pricetag is much to high. As a user of the premium subscription this makes me cancel that subscription anyway, because I was in belive supporting all the free (Plug-In)-Users with the high pricetag to the desktop version.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 12303032 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 4점Firefox 사용자 12165269 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점anitabueckler 님, 한 달 전Just use v9.0.1 and the add-on works again as it should. The dictionaries are included, that why it's about 15MB. Or we could simply edit the xpi (which is a ZIP) to fix the latest version. ;)
- Jeez, forcing a premium subscription to use the extension. I switched over to this from grammarly because it became AI slop filled, but now this extension has done the same and is removing the free tier because of it. AI is expensive, harms the environment, and generally isn't worth the costs. Remove the AI features and return the free tier, you'll get way more users by doing that.
- Used to be good, considering the free tier. Now only for premium subscribers. The developers should explicitly state this information upfront in the first lines of the extension description, allowing users to avoid spending time installing it and then uninstalling it a couple of minutes later.
- 5점 만점에 1점toohehimforthem 님, 한 달 전Used to be free for a long time, but has started asking for a premium subscription just to use it at all. I'm disabled and was using it to spell check but I can't afford this. I guess its back to mixed up words now if I'm not having a very efficient day with fighting it.
- 5점 만점에 1점Clueingforbeggs 님, 한 달 전They got rid of their free tier, forcing users to pay for features they clearly do not want to use (and it's obvious they know this, because they're advertising it as an upgrade to premium, despite the fact that the cost of running premium is why they're doing this), just because those features were too expensive for the people who actually want to use them.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 20120274 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 20122884 님, 한 달 전Was good until it ask to pay to work (unless you want an extension that just say "use premium to use extension", so not "Some features may require payment" ...
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 20081746 님, 한 달 전Nie dość, że słabe to teraz jeszcze wymuszają premium, żeby w ogóle działało. Podziękuję za tę wątpliwą przyjemność.
- 5점 만점에 1점DONTBLAMEMEM8 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 20118795 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 19755324 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 20118462 님, 한 달 전Useless, doesnt do anything unless you pay for a premium subscription. For a simple spell checker thats terrible. It was awesome for the first week, before I realised I was using a free tiral for the premium version. All this did was highlight how well a simple spell checker can work, but with zero basic features its entirely useless. Im not signing up to a subscription for a simple spell checker.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19681566 님, 한 달 전
- I used this tool for several months and and had a good experience with it for a long time, however, the recent changes make it unusable as an extension without paying.
Prior to this, I would have given it a 5-star rating, and should have, but I cannot currently do so given the price.
I wish for the best and hope that it does well, though I will personally not continue using it for the foreseeable future, even if I understand the reasoning behind the changes. If you are willing to pay for its services however, it is very high quality and I experienced few, if any issues with it.