Shinigami Eyes에 대한 리뷰
Shinigami Eyes 제작자: Shinigami Eyes
리뷰 1,394개
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18975238 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18991084 님, 일 년 전Transmisogynistic transmascs rlly hate when you point out they're being transmisogynistic! This extension is working as intended ^_^
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 17842059 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 18987260 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점TertiaryNemo 님, 일 년 전I wish I wasn't having to write this review, but the recent trend in this extension's highlights is pretty clear. It's no longer reliable and frequently flags explicitly pro-LGBT sources/sites as red and notably TERF-y sources as green. Terrible loss for anyone who used it in years past.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 18987003 님, 일 년 전Used to be a great tool, but now it's just used by the people who run it to flag people who disagree with what being trans "should" look like- such as targeting trans men who speak out about their experiences instead of shutting up and suffering in silence.
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 18986051 님, 일 년 전I personally think its fine despite the suspicious review bombing lol
- 5점 만점에 1점toohehimforthem 님, 일 년 전This app was one I used to use all the time, Particularly on sites like YouTube and such where I didn't want to give advertising money to transphobes. However, this app is now being used as a weapon for lateral aggression by people who want to erase trans men and our experiences, and I can no longer support it in good conscience until something is fixed. Trans men get flagged red for talking about the transphobia we face as men, because people don't like it when marginalized people mention situations where intersectional struggles seem to erase (often conditional in these specific cases and that's why it is able to be taken away) privilege, and that isn't okay.
- works fine. not foolproof, but broadly its perfectly functional. very rarely have i seen somebody marked red where they shouldn't be - the reverse IS more common though. I pay way more attention to red markings than green ones as a result. many negative reviews are because people forget it's possible to be trans and transphobic at the same time, and that you can contest false markings if you see fit.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 18969773 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Usually the Butz 님, 일 년 전I do not recommend. It marks outright TERFs and radfems as green, and transmascs/men, nonbinary people, and intersex people as red.
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 16602695 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점FeminineFreyaNyctophile 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 5점sharpdoggyteeth 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점jirai in dreamland 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 1점uncarved.turnip 님, 일 년 전
- 5점 만점에 3점Firefox 사용자 18967099 님, 일 년 전I'm kind of mixed on this add-on. It is helpful for identifying anti-LGBT news outlets and sites...
But, when it comes to social media accounts, I've encountered accounts that have been falsely mass-reported for seemingly no reason. It's usually pretty accurate, but some accounts seem to be randomly reported. At this point, it's almost more like an indicator on whether someone has ever participated in trans discourse at all rather than an easy yes-trans-safe or no-transphobe system.