Shinigami Eyes에 대한 리뷰
Shinigami Eyes 제작자: Shinigami Eyes
리뷰 1,448개
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 20047351 님, 한 달 전
- pretty good. ive been using it for a while and has been largely accurate. im not sure the specifics of the process. but as of late it seems false negatives within the system have been circulating just for people combating transmisogyny. one thing that would help is when somebody is marked red or green (though it would benefit red marks the most) it gives a reason why they were marked such and a link/screenshot to where the person expressed a belief which way. don't use it without checking, especially for red marks, but it can help bring your attention to whether or not a person might be transphobic
- alright I gotta swallow my pride and say that when I made my last review, I was duped. I was poorly informed by the reviews, and after using the plugin and better understanding the actual conversation around the relevant issues, I'm changing my 1 star review to a 5 star review.
Effective plugin, and it feels nice to see green names going around. Recommended if you think it would help you. - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 20037153 님, 한 달 전I looked at the guidelines when wondering why so many pro-transgender pages are marked red and it sounds like using assigned-gender-at-birth language is being encouraged as "do not mark trans-friendly" due to transmisogyny. Julia Serrano's article on what transmisogyny is does use that language. So am I supposed to mark Julia Serrano as anti-trans??? I'm supposed to flag the woman who coined the term "transmisogyny" as being violently transphobic? That sounds rather counterproductive! Can the developer explain why this is supposed to make sense? Are people flagging others just to see them turn red? Did anti-trans people raid the app, and the mods just can't keep up?
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 17758123 님, 한 달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점EmpurressNepetaIII 님, 2달 전
- It works fine. Of course anything with a community-sourced database is gonna have its misfires, but overall it serves its purpose well enough.
I'd like the ability to mark stuff on mobile firefox too, though. Or at least to be able to manually import an override list, or something along those lines. - 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 16876736 님, 2달 전if you are a trans woman you NEED this extention. if you are a trans man who knows transandrophobia is not an actual axis of oppression and wants to be more of a transfeminist you NEED this extention.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19938679 님, 2달 전Horribly transphobic extension! It marks trans men/mascs, nonbinary people, and intersex people as "transphobic" for simply talking about the oppression they face, meanwhile trans women/fems are allowed to be as racist, ableist, and laterally queerphobic as they want, and they're somehow fine. The creators of this extension should be ashamed of themselves. At best, there's no oversight or verification of any kind to prevent this, and at worst, this is something they actively encourage. Absolutely disgusting.
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 20016844 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 1점calicoCatkind 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 5점NixDrgnslyr 님, 2달 전If you have basic information parsing skills you'll be fine using this extension. False positives are real but they can be fixed if more people use the extension lol
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 17829284 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19975913 님, 2달 전this is not useful, easy for misinformation to spread via mass flagging campaigns. it is better to make your own opinions of someone. similar to AI it is not good to outsource your thinking ability.
- fantastic extension. It's very nice if you do a lot of research or news reading. I only wish that someone being colored by it included a little blurb on hover that quickly summarized why they got colored.
Don't be scared by the ratings. From what I can tell, the review bombing seems to be transmisogynists doing the DARVO thing, similar to when white people say "you know, calling people racist is the REAL racism". - 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19976373 님, 2달 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 19975055 님, 2달 전Look, regardless of your opinion on whether "transandrophobia" is real or not, being transphobic towards trans men is still transphobia and is still bad. There should never be a kind of trans person that it is acceptable to be transphobic towards, and just because you are trans yourself doesn't make what you're saying any less transphobic. A gay person can still be homophobic, a trans person can still be transphobic, and I have seen far too many transphobic trans people marked in green because they support trans women while oftentimes putting down or even parroting TERF rhetoric in regards to trans men or nonbinary people.
Giving it two stars because it served its purpose for a good while and I think it would be disingenuous to pretend it never worked; I have had it installed for years at this point and used to regularly contribute by going into transphobic threads and marking every transphobe in red so others knew and could block them, but I've seen too many false greens by this point, along with people marked red that have never said anything about trans people at all let alone say something transmisogynistic. And I don't want to hear the "multiple reports have to be made to get a red mark" argument, it's known there's groups that target people en masse to get a false flag in amidst the genuine flags. And if you are one of the people saying that all the people marked green are trans friendly, you've either successfully blocked and avoided all the transphobes or you're blind to transphobia directed at anyone that isn't transfem.
Finishing up by saying this tool no longer follows its own rules. It has never been exclusively a transmisogyny detector - it is even supposed to encompass exorsexism (listed as "enby-phobia"). Read the extensions own guidelines (shinigami-eyes dot github dot io) before claiming otherwise.