Recenzje dodatku LeechBlock NG
LeechBlock NG Autor: James Anderson
1823 recenzje
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14487207, 8 lat temuThe reason I get any work done in these days when there are so much distractions.
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: DevilKill88, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14471088, 8 lat temuThis app saves me from wasting hours on social media EVERY SINGLE DAY! :)
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14468605, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14459547, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Igor Orlov, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 13022649, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14452845, 8 lat temuThis addon has saved me from youtube. I used to sit at my computer for hours watching youtube but now i can use my computer again without getting distracted.
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14441224, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Dusk P, 8 lat temuAlthough the settings examples at the developer's website are very helpful, it would be nice if the website's FAQ was expanded to explain each line of the settings, because I didn't find the settings easy to figure out. But this is partly because Leechblock is such a powerful, flexible program. Customer support is great too. I'm very glad indeed that I found this program; it's just what I needed.
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 13679806, 8 lat temuDoes everything exactly as advertised. Wish it was available on Microsoft Edge as well.
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14420205, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 13541059, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: v.miheer, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14402432, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14397834, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14391298, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14388500, 8 lat temuWorks really well, stays out of my way but allows for reasonable access to sites when necessary.
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14388454, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14376048, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 14373756, 8 lat temuSo far it does what it is supposed to do and keeps me focused on work
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: cigaretteparfum, 8 lat temuOh, man, I remember when I had this add-on. It was almost life-saving. (If I were a more dramatic person, I would've said it was DEFINITELY life-saving.) I think I stopped having it after numerous Firefox update that made the version I used incompatible. I haven't felt the need to block certain sites again, thanks to the disciplined habit this add-on helped me build. But now, I'm slipping on the procrastination track, and no better time than to re-install this add-on.
The add-on is highly versatile and doesn't dictate you on how and when to use it. Multiple options make it highly customisable to your own needs, including multiple options of site-blocking groups (i.e., you don't have to worry about needing to access one site while it's being blocked together with another site -- put them in different group, activate them separately, and you're good), scheduled blocking time, ability to start blocking at any time you want, and the option to override the block if you desperately need to (personally not recommended to use unless it's a life or death situation).
If you're looking for a site blocker that's easly altered to your needs as well as easy to use, this is the one for you. - Ocena: 5/5Autor: Mattwmaster58, 8 lat temu
- Ocena: 5/5Autor: Woudi Kherenc, 8 lat temuExcellent extension! I removed a star because of a bug I just found: it seems that if you use "blank page" instead of "default page" in the "how to block" section, the site is not actually blocked. Happy to give the star back when this is corrected.
Edit: I was not able to reproduce the bug, so I'm giving back the fifth star. :-)Odpowiedź autora
Data: 8 lat temuThanks for the review. I just tested the Blank Page option and it works fine for me. I haven't received any other reports of a problem here. I recommend you post it as an issue on GitHub (see LB support page) so I can investigate further.