Отзывы на «NoScript»
NoScript от Giorgio Maone
2 478 отзывов
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Desod, 9 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13567263, 9 лет назадGood Addon. The useability is going better.
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13566908, 9 лет назадI have used noScript for years now. It is an essential part of my browsing. However since Quantum the UI for it is no longer intuitive and I am having issues running other extensions such as flipIt (flipboard) because I see no way to allow flipboard script to run.
I would really like to see the old UI return as it was way more intuitive. Now I have to go through multiple steps to get to the allow script option for just a few scripts on a page.
Also if there is a method in which to cross check what kind of scripts are running when using certain extensions like flipIt (flipboard) are activated that would be fantastic as well.
As of now it appears I need to run my fireFox without no Script because I am not able to get the functionality I once had before Quantum. Which I am sure will sooner or later become available.
thanks for the work on this addOn it is great!
Only reason it is 3 stars and not 5 is because it is not quite there as far as quantum compatibility and functioning. - Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13141862, 9 лет назад
- Оценено на 2 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13565802, 9 лет назадBefore latest Firefox update, I would have given this add-on a 5. The current version has left me disappointed.
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Juri Müller, 9 лет назад
- Оценено на 3 из 5от StevenH928, 9 лет назадI understand everyone's frustration but they need to take into account that Firefox has drastically changed an add-on authors are having to recreate their work from scratch. The fact that this person has chosen to tackle this challenge is to be commended and I'm sure as time goes by more functionality will be added, bringing it closer to the product you know and love.
So just chill and let the coder do his thing. - Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13562716, 9 лет назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13503974, 9 лет назад
- Оценено на 2 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13372577, 9 лет назадIt does work (more or less) so I cannot justify a 1-star rating. But like others have said, this is not the NoScript we knew and loved. And while I know there is a temptation to just blame Firefox57 for old addons no longer working well, the truth is that we cannot blame Firefox57 for the dreadful new interface that NoScript has, nor for the buggy way it works (forgetting your settings, for example).
I don't want to be overly harsh here. For many years this developer has given us a fantastic product that millions of us found "essential". For that he must be commended. However, the new NoScript no longer has a place in my little "arsenal of defence". I've moved on.
If anyone is interested in alternatives, I find uBlock Origin is enough for my needs, provided the "I'm an advanced user" option is checked off and third party scripts / frames are globally blocked ("medium blocking mode", as per the author). If you want more power, there is uMatrix - still not a 100% replacement for NoScript but good enough for the vast majority of people. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13561329, 9 лет назадfür mich der beste script blocker. man muss in zwar selbst etwas einstellen - dafür gibts garantiert keine werbung!
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Барон Бела, 9 лет назадНа хлеб уже мажется, хотя до удобства старой версии еще работать и работать. Надеюсь, этот незаменимый аддон все-таки возродится из пепла.
- Оценено на 2 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13560145, 9 лет назадHad better experiences with NoScript years ago. The new version with the current Firefox is bad. It forgets settings and is buggy. I'am using ScriptSafe now. It's the same as under chrome. This addon works fine.
- Оценено на 2 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13559767, 9 лет назад
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13558998, 9 лет назадNoScript my favourite extension, made browsing the internet a joy with no unsolicited popups.
But new interface for Firefox 57 is so useless it nearly makes it impossible to use.
It doesn't seem to save page settings for some sites, so you get constantly have to set the settings again for that site.
And the completely missing auto page reload of the old version is complete missing.
So please either put back the old interface or spend some time and make improvements to the layout of the new interface. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13558812, 9 лет назадThank you Giorgio!!! NoScript rocks.
Ever since I know Noscript, i feel better being on the internet.
For a long time I used the "old" NoScript, loved it and feel without naked...
57.0.1 on the NEW interface looks like "the next level" - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13441018, 9 лет назадW10 17 09, NoScript 10.1.5.1, FF 57.0.1
After lots of testing - really everything works perfectly.
Even better comfort when visiting new sites.
Very glad with the new release!
Thank you Giorgio! - Оценено на 2 из 5от Anonymous, 9 лет назадThe new version has to be fixed full stop. The UI did not need to be fixed. And now the app does not remember settings on some sites. I'm thinking about uninstalling this until it is back up to its previous quality.
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Pairofolives, 9 лет назад"In order to operate on this tab, NoScript needs to reload it. Proceed?"
I see this a lot lately. Seems the extension isn't working well. Also, the status icon isn't always showing correct status. - Оценено на 4 из 5от Yoon, 9 лет назадThis addon still working. The main reason people hate this new version is because they misunderstand the UI. Sure the new version lacks some convenient functions like block list. You have to configue every site the first time you visit it. But after that everything worked like a charm.
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13557545, 9 лет назад
- Оценено на 2 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13557273, 9 лет назадIn its current state it is absolutly not functional and productive. I liked the older interface a lot more.