Отзывы на «Privacy Possum»
Privacy Possum от cowlicks
423 отзыва
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14290419, 8 лет назадHaven't been on it very long. So far, so good. May resubmit later.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14259190, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от The Beard Below My Chin, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14279693, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Zé Ribeiro, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 12370795, 8 лет назадCan you please say more about how your add-on is falsifying the data gathered by tracking companies. Does it modify any fingerprinting data?
If so is it compatible with the extension CanvasBlocker? Or does it do the same as CanvasBlocker.Ответ разработчика
размещено 8 лет назадHi KIMW, there is a more in depth explanation about how blocking fingerprinting works here: https://github.com/cowlicks/privacypossum#browser-fingerprinting
Please let me know if you have any further questions after reading that. That way I can clarify documentation to avoid confusion in the future.
Privacy Possum *should* be compatible with with CanvasBlocker. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Édouard Lopez, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от LiaraTsoni, 8 лет назадTell me WHY are you using a UI library for display a couple of checkboxes ? What it will be the next time ? A virtual machine ? An add-on has to be light and efficient com'on.
UPDATE :
Thx for your reply, I understand. But I'm not talking about the code size. The size doesn't really matter, I'm just need a couple of bytes for doing a infinite loop. Using a library take more CPU and memory than vanilla. Using it one time isn't really a problem, but when you have five add-ons with five dependencies each... Grrrr ! Anyway you're doing a good job, thanks for your add-on.Ответ разработчика
размещено 8 лет назадHi, thank you for your comment. I plan on using react later to expand the features the popup has. There have been quite a lot of requests for this. As well as an options page. I may switch to a smaller library in the future. Adding react also helped fix several UI bugs, and makes the current UI easier to build on.
FWIW, adding react only adds ~35kb to the packaged file, a %15 increase. Unpacked it is ~120kb. However the public suffix list, and multi-domain first party list combined are 160kb. So I didn't think it was a very significant size bump. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13230603, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14123273, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от sBRB4Q7, 8 лет назадThis is the best anti-tracking addon! The developer is fast and responsive.
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13828166, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14248841, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13404270, 8 лет назадHello, can we use the extension in addition to "Privacy badger" and "ublock origin" and "disconnect"?
Edit: Thank =)Ответ разработчика
размещено 8 лет назадThanks for the review! To answer the question: yes! Please let me know if you have any questions. - Оценено на 4 из 5от JxReach, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13489523, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от nir94, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14243006, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Alberto T. Gomez, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14239461, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Jon, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13746467, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14224752, 8 лет назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14211116, 8 лет назадThe add-on is good, accomplishes the essential as privacy.
The only inconvenience that it does not protect me from the fingerprint tracking.
I did two online tests(Am I unique?, Panopticlick EFF) with the extension enabled, and in both of them my test result was positive.Ответ разработчика
размещено 8 лет назадTL;DR Panopticlick and Am I Unique use a homerolled assortment of tracking code that is impractical for commercial tracking.
I'll go into a little detail about Panopticlick to explain more. Panopticlick uses a deployment of the open source fingerprinting tool Fingerprintjs2, along with their own unique fingerprinting code.
I added some debug code and visited Panopticlick I see Privacy Possum detects the page accessing 12 API's that are marked for watching for fingerprinting. Except this is split over 3 different scripts:
https://panopticlick.eff.org/static/fp2.js
https://panopticlick.eff.org/static/fetch_whorls.js
https://panopticlick.eff.org/static/deployJava.js
Privacy watches for fingerprinting on *per script basis*, this is a reasonable assumption because, normally a websites tracking code is bundled into one place, so that the tracking info can be easily aggregated and used. I'm not aware of a real deployment where tracking is split up like this. It is practical for panopticlick (and Am I Unique) because they want to present information about your tracking independently, and manage the code to do that in a more practical way.
For a demonstration of the fingerprinting detection code, I usually point folks to:
http://valve.github.io/fingerprintjs2/
I think it is worth considering cases like Panopticlick, or Am I Unique, because they can be used to evade PP's novel detection. But I have not seen a case like this in the wild. - Оценено на 5 из 5от josefmax, 8 лет назад