Отзывы на «Tab Stash»
Tab Stash от Josh Berry
480 отзывов
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 15638270, 7 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Titus, 7 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от jI, 7 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от ath0rus, 8 месяцев назадThe name of this extensions is not wrong, It stash's tabs. Out of all the extensions I tried (and I tried alot) this does it the best. Yes the setup is a wee bit confusing but once that was sorted I managed to get it working exactly how I wanted it too. This should be a base firefox feature, Idk why it is not already (needs to be part of firefox view).
The only one thing I would like to see (other then it being part of firefox view) is the ability to select multiple tabs in a stash and export them to a file (for sharing else where)
Edit: the dev responded and I am embarrased I missed the setting to import and export, It literally is the exact addon I was looking for. Now my firefox actualy loads fast.Ответ разработчика
размещено 8 месяцев назадI'm happy to hear it's working well for you! There is indeed an export feature, it's hiding in the "..." menu for each folder (or the main menu next to the search box). You can choose from several formats and copy/paste into the location of your choice.
Sorry to hear the setup was a bit confusing, if you'd like to chat more about it, feel free to open an issue on GitHub. And thanks for the review! - Оценено на 5 из 5от PO_IS_ON, 8 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от mio, 8 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 13978806, 10 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19188203, 10 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от AEZ314, 10 месяцев назадI'm in love with this extension! Would love to see it on Chrome based browsers too (please port it, I desperately need it lol)
Ответ разработчика
размещено 10 месяцев назадThanks, I'm really happy you like it! A Chrome port is unfortunately very unlikely, because Tab Stash uses a lot of Firefox-specific things. Also, I am not a Chrome user, so wouldn't be able to provide good support for it. But it may happen one day, I won't say "never". :) - Оценено на 5 из 5от STAR CRIMSON, год назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Aoshi Shinomori, год назадI've been a Firefox user since ver. 2 and this is my very first extension review. It's an essential complement to get your bazillion tabs back after an unexpected error or closing the wrong window. Simple and easy to use, thanks Josh!
Ответ разработчика
размещено год назадYou're quite welcome! I'm glad you like it. Thanks for the review, I'm honored to be your first. :) - Оценено на 5 из 5от BasalComet92836, год назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 19010334, год назад
- Absolutely a crazy good addon that is surely the killer feature of Firefox. I am so amazed how quickly and smoothly this addon can manage 1200+ groups and 36000+ tabs across 20 devices. It's simply unbelievable. Thank you so much for this great addon. Great softwares truly can change people's life in such a positive way.
Ответ разработчика
размещено год назадYou're very welcome, I'm really glad to hear Tab Stash has been helpful! I'm also happy to hear it's performing well for you; that's something I try to pay close attention to. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18997982, год назадPlease add flag to create with old folder name when search is active instead of the search terms
>edit
Instead of whatever is typed in search , i would like the option for folder names to be created as in Version 3.1.1
Search terms as folder names are too contitional , restrictive to work without affecting stash organization even more when having to manage numerous diverse tabs
The search terms can be regex , random , short , ever changing etc ; they ignore the how often a new folder is created that can be set in the addon options when the search term is changed ; selecting and chosing to create a new folder will just do the same and can lead to duplicate folders if the search terms remains the same , at least in this case the folder names with 3.1.1 format would not be identical ; now if technically speaking the search term would check not only the topmost folder in the stash root but check all top folders (not sub folders) then it would just stash in a old folder where in this case the outcome wouldn't be desired so theres no avoiding this issue
3.1.1 naming format didn't had those downsides and was simple to work withОтвет разработчика
размещено год назадI'd like to better-understand why this is causing you problems; feel free to open an issue on GitHub and we can discuss from there!