Recensioner för Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool av LanguageTooler GmbH
5 267 recensioner
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 19681566, för 6 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av M01t3n, för 7 dagar sedanI used this tool for several months and and had a good experience with it for a long time, however, the recent changes make it unusable as an extension without paying.
Prior to this, I would have given it a 5-star rating, and should have, but I cannot currently do so given the price.
I wish for the best and hope that it does well, though I will personally not continue using it for the foreseeable future, even if I understand the reasoning behind the changes. If you are willing to pay for its services however, it is very high quality and I experienced few, if any issues with it. - Betygsatt 1 av 5av raxa, för 7 dagar sedan"We have made the difficult decision to limit the use of LanguageTool’s browser extension to Premium users only."
Ah yes using the browser extention is paid but you can still install it for "free" ... yes ... i'm shure it will help to not died again free ai ... - Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 20115663, för 7 dagar sedanGREEDY EXTENSION. NOW ASKS FOR MONEY JUST FOR USE IT.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Аноним, för 8 dagar sedanIt worked badly, contains lot of misspells, and recently developers just removed free usage. It was 3 of 5 early, now worse then 1/5
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 13908078, för 8 dagar sedanThis extension established itself at a time when there were few alternatives, giving it a firm market share in its category. But now, when there are a bunch of alternatives to choose from, you decide to put every single feature behind a paywall?
You deserve to make some money out of your work but damn, that is a wild decision. - Betygsatt 1 av 5av loomloon, för 9 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 2 av 5av Nícholas Kegler, för 9 dagar sedanIt was good, but I often had issues with the extension. It was full of bugs. Recently, after accepting changes, it stopped replacing the original text correctly and would basically concatenate the old text with the corrected version.
Now they want to start charging for usage, which is fine— I get it. But at least make the product reliable before asking people to pay for it. - Betygsatt 1 av 5av Tim, för 9 dagar sedanWhen using any of the non-American English languages, I found that many words are missing. Absolutely bizarre that it doesn't have all the words in from the big dictionaries as a base-line. This was ok when it was free, but I'm not paying for a spell checker that doesn't know what's in the dictionary. You know your AI is slopping it up when Word 97 does a better job.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Rvier.fr, för 9 dagar sedanNo free tiers anymore. Require a premium account, so identification required. And add difficulty to run his own hosted server.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av treilly94, för 9 dagar sedanWas great until they wanted to charge a monthly subscription
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 17759722, för 9 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av defcon2XX8, för 9 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av mrbruno, för 9 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Midas, för 9 dagar sedanMajor privacy concern. The extension's privacy policy states that it can collect and store text, prompts, chats, files, metadata, IP addresses, usage data, and browsing-related information. It also states that collected data may be used for analytics, service improvement, and AI model training.
I only want a text-correction tool. Sending and retaining this much data is unacceptable for such a basic function, especially when handling potentially sensitive text. EU and especially US users should carefully consider the privacy implications before installing this extension. - Betygsatt 1 av 5av jo, för 9 dagar sedanUninstalled because it's no longer free. I don't understand why this would be the case when there are free alternatives. Very disappointing.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 20111655, för 9 dagar sedanWas free for basic functionality, now all features require subscription.
- Betygsatt 3 av 5av Chris Hayes, för 9 dagar sedan$6 / month for a grammar checker is too much. Seems like the extension is just trying to capitalize on the AI hype. LanguageTool has been a reliable alternative to Grammarly for years, so only docking 2 stars.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 14073020, för 10 dagar sedanLocking the browser extension behind a fire wall is a scumy thing to do.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 16675063, för 10 dagar sedanGreat free tool until it gave in to greed, will wait for an alternative
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 20109001, för 11 dagar sedanWorked great until it didn't. But asking way too much for a spellchecker.
I don't mind paying for things, would have been happy to give £10 for a perpetual license.
But £4 a month?! Taking the piss m8. Uninstalled. - Betygsatt 1 av 5av AlkseeyaKC, för 11 dagar sedanIt was great until they wanted money for it. Sorry, but not everyone has $15 they can dish out to all these companies pay walling us. Maybe I would consider if it was cheaper and I had more income, but I don't. BECAUSE OF ALL THE GD SUBSCRIPTIONS to live my life!