It's good except enabling itself by default for all websites. The sub-menu to find that toggle is small/easy to miss. I don't know why I'd want messy extension converted dark themes over a native one.

It's good except enabling itself by default for all websites. The sub-menu to find that toggle is small/easy to miss. I don't know why I'd want messy extension converted dark themes over a native one.

muito bom, mas algumas logos ficam bugadas

Its all black now

thank you

.

sometimes a little clunky with dark mode detection but works really well for sites without dark mode support and you can set it to only enable when your device is in dark mode. plus works on mobile

4 out of 5. It works great on most websites, but breaks Wikipedia, even when using Wikipedia's native dark mode without the extension converting the page to dark. When viewing Wikipedia pages in Firefox with Dark Reader enabled as an extension (but not running on the page), images on Wikipedia do not close and stay open across other Wikipedia urls.

well it's good in general but far from ideal. For corporate sites it's a must-have: its filter mode is often better than the corporate "Dark" mode even if it exists.


I miss a method to disable or alter modes based on the full URL instead of domain (this will immensely help for plaintext in particular).
Also it doesn't invert PDFs.

Three things annoy me about it: the slowness of the dynamic modes, failure of Filter mode to display plaintext files readably (they show them as an black text on an almost-black background), and inability to crate full-page screenshots with Filter modes (the part of the page which isn't displayed at the time of the screenshot doesn't have the inverted colours). This all annoys me far less than the white-background sites, like addons.mozilla.org (and there are others too which somehow avoid being inverted while not being protected), but that's not the add-on failure, partly because I can swiftly mitigate the add-on troubles using hotkeys.