Відгуки для Wayback Machine
Wayback Machine автор Internet Archive
372 відгуки
- Оцінка 4 з 5від jokenngo, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від twotwos, 4 роки томуOk. This extension used to be *bad*. It was limited in its use and had a serious problem with what I'm terming "archive misfire", where it would decide to redirect some pages (which would otherwise load just fine!) to a new page where it gave you the option to view it in the archive. When you didn't need to.
Yet now! As of February this year, the extension has leapt all the way from version 1.8.6 to version 3.0, and let me tell you, this version absolutely slaps. It's brilliant. Archive misfire is no more, and it's got all sorts of helpful little options. The Internet Archive has taken this extension from an over-agressive bookmarklet to a really quite helpful browsing tool. If you scorned this extension before, I invite you to give it another go; and if you're here for the first time, don't be scared off by the review score - truly, things are better now. Also, some other reviews mention needing to login to save pages, a requirement which has been lifted as of ~a month ago. - Оцінка 5 з 5від tianheg, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від kimme, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Timmel, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 4 з 5від John Harris, 4 роки томуGenerally works well. It falls short in:
- Frequently auto-updating and then not operating at all until the user agrees to new permissions, which is a drag on workflow.
- Persists in annoying me with pop-up boxes to "check out more great features in settings," which is obnoxious when commercial software does it, let alone when a utility put out by a non-profit does. It should do its job and get out of my way. - Оцінка 5 з 5від Evo Morales, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Sam Wilson, 4 роки томуThis is a great extension. It is much quicker to save a page than it used to be, and has quick links to archived versions of pages. The auto-archive feature is brilliant.
- Оцінка 5 з 5від gmanore, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 4 з 5від Jamchuck, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Користувач Firefox 13434336, 4 роки томуYou need to login to save a page & the last 3 or 4 updates are really bad for privacy.
I used it since it was a test-pilot program for Firefox in 2016 (no more 404s). But since all new "features" are really bad I uninstalled it. - Оцінка 5 з 5від 10emanresu, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 1 з 5від A Firefox User, 4 роки томуThe add-on now forces you to log in to archive a page, but previous versions (and the archive.org website) have no such requirement. This login requirement is a serious regression that prevents me from using this version at all. I'm not going to create an account for no reason; I'd prefer to remain anonymous. I've reverted back to version 1.8.6 (which is still available here under "See all versions").
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Користувач Firefox 17305735, 4 роки томуEverytime I go to my Banks website this plugin rediects me to its own page. Removed plugin from Firefox
- Оцінка 5 з 5від Користувач Firefox 13112025, 4 роки томуVersion 3.0 works fine here!
With the new feature, which shows saved status of the page right away, now it is very easy to make a decision whether or not to save the page. To do this with prior versions, I had to first check the newest saved page and to see if it exists or not. The saving process is being done in background, so I can browse other pages while the add-on saves a page.
(Below is my review a year ago about previous version)
--------------------------------------------------
Once worked fine, but for the past few months, it has got "Fail with status: 498 No Reason Phrase" error with Retry button, which fails all the time on firefox (waterfox as well). So, now this extension is quite useless and needs to be updated. - Оцінка 5 з 5від GenericUsername0201, 4 роки тому
- Оцінка 1 з 5від kev, 5 років томуI have found all functions of this add on, including archiving pages, detecting dead links and requesting archived pages to be entirely non functional. It prevents me from accessing working sites so often that I finally relented and uninstalled the add on
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Hp93, 5 років томуToo often it misdetect a perfectly fine website as "not found" and redirect to the addon page.
- Оцінка 3 з 5від GP, 5 років томуHigh failure rate. Needs fixing. Great when it works! I just wish it worked reliably. Too important a tool to be this unreliable.
- Оцінка 4 з 5від Користувач Firefox 13884442, 5 років тому
- Оцінка 3 з 5від Korwin, 5 років томуMozilla Firefox 96.0b6 (64-bit) — версия 1.8.6 дополнения грешит частыми ложными срабатываниями на живых, доступных вебстраницах. В настройках дополнения нет возможности включить отображение на страницах со снимками веб-страниц верхней панели с временной шкалой.
- Оцінка 4 з 5від Zeteo, 5 років тому