Bewertungen für AudD® Musikerkennung
AudD® Musikerkennung von AudD, LLC
Bewertungen von dbaser
Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen
von dbaser, vor 2 JahrenChanged my original 1-star review to 4 stars after reading Developer response. I was originally under the impression that this requires Sign Up and is only a Free Trial of an extension. I thought this for a few reasons:
1) Before using, I read other reviews stating the same thing.
2) When I first tried to use it without an API token, it did not find any songs I tried. I then opened Settings and saw a field for an API token and the words "API token, paste it below" and thought that it must not work without an API token. I signed up for the API token (not knowing the API is a separate product) and after creating an account the dashboard shows that the user is on a 2-week Free Trial. I thought this applied to the extension, not the API.
3) There is a link on the main extension page to a Privacy Policy which differed from the one I read on the API dashboard, which further contributed to my impression that it is a paid extension, as I was unaware they are two separate products.
Now that I have read the Developer response, when I go to Settings, I can clearly see that it reads "If you're subscribed to the AudD® Music recognition API and have an API token, paste it below." I didn't notice this at first and thought the API token was required.
I have tried it and you can indeed use the extension to find songs without any API token. I gave the extension four stars instead of five only because the AHA extension is still better at actual song recognition. Thanks for the response developer! My apologies for assuming the worst in my original review.
1) Before using, I read other reviews stating the same thing.
2) When I first tried to use it without an API token, it did not find any songs I tried. I then opened Settings and saw a field for an API token and the words "API token, paste it below" and thought that it must not work without an API token. I signed up for the API token (not knowing the API is a separate product) and after creating an account the dashboard shows that the user is on a 2-week Free Trial. I thought this applied to the extension, not the API.
3) There is a link on the main extension page to a Privacy Policy which differed from the one I read on the API dashboard, which further contributed to my impression that it is a paid extension, as I was unaware they are two separate products.
Now that I have read the Developer response, when I go to Settings, I can clearly see that it reads "If you're subscribed to the AudD® Music recognition API and have an API token, paste it below." I didn't notice this at first and thought the API token was required.
I have tried it and you can indeed use the extension to find songs without any API token. I gave the extension four stars instead of five only because the AHA extension is still better at actual song recognition. Thanks for the response developer! My apologies for assuming the worst in my original review.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 2 JahrenApologies for causing confusion; the extension does not require a sign-up. You can use it without an API token. The API token field is for people with an active subscription. The free trial is for our API product and shouldn’t be used in the extension; the extension works without an API account and is completely free.
Extension users are subject to the add-on's privacy policy. Website sign-ups are not required to use the add-on.
(Thanks for taking the time to review! It’s valuable to know people might think a token is required; we’ll make changes to make it clear that it’s not.
Users can also reach us at hello@audd.io).
If there are any particular songs AHA recognizes that we don't, please also let us know- our music recognition accuracy should be higher on average
Extension users are subject to the add-on's privacy policy. Website sign-ups are not required to use the add-on.
(Thanks for taking the time to review! It’s valuable to know people might think a token is required; we’ll make changes to make it clear that it’s not.
Users can also reach us at hello@audd.io).
If there are any particular songs AHA recognizes that we don't, please also let us know- our music recognition accuracy should be higher on average
191 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Unamelable, vor einem MonatWas nice free music identifier for firefox. Now requires registration with gmail only (don't allow any other emails).
Datagrabbing trash like that can burn in hell.
I would put 3 stars because sometimes it works-sometimes isn't.
Right now i can't recommend it because now its just another privacy violation service.
USE LIBREZAM INSTEAD! - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon SoupRice, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon user_7, vor einem MonatExcellent extension, it met my needs perfectly. It can identify songs directly from YouTube with precision, including some that are not available on streaming platforms.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19778199, vor 3 MonatenWorks fine at first then requires a subscription to continue working - AVOID!!
I found Librezam is an alternative that doesn't need a subscription to function. - Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Anon007, vor 4 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon DeineMudda69, vor 4 MonatenOnly mediocre at recognizing songs. Eventually asks me for an "API token" because my limit was reached. GTFO.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon OKRA, vor 4 MonatenIt works majority of the imes and I install it in every browser I use. No idea why it has only 3 stars, deserves atleast 4 imo.
edit: oh apparently it bugged out a few months back so thats why it has 3 stars. In its current state its a 5 star for me. - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Soup, vor 4 MonatenHas not been able to recognize a single song I tried identifying.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon aydro, vor 5 Monatenare you kidding me, you now have to PAY just to use the extension?
get out of my extensions list.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 5 MonatenA bug, not an intended behavior. We're investigating (thx to a user who reported this on GitHub issues).
Could you please share your browser version? - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon jjbJXNjkxb, vor 6 Monatenliterally told me to pay up to be able to recognize a song off a single local file on my pc
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon centurion 2000, vor 6 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Alex Reynard, vor 7 MonatenAsking for money for new features? Fine. Changing the main feature of the software, that was previously free, to now being paid-access-only? No. You're gone.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon cobalt, vor 7 MonatenWorks really well with livestreams, its impressive really.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon MiBenn, vor 8 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19433736, vor 9 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Quetzal, vor 9 MonatenBroken and returns the error message:
An unexpected error occurred during recording: ReferenceError: elemForRecording is not defined
Sometimes just doesn't do anything at all. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Enzo, vor 10 MonatenWonderful job! Helped me countless times! And now there is no bugs anymore!
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Dreadnought, vor 10 MonatenWorks with youtube, does not work with Twitch
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Пётр Богданов, vor 10 MonatenНе работает. Выдает вот такое:
Recognition failed: sorry, sanctions prevent us from providing our services in your region.
А при включенном впн пишет:
Простите, на этом сайте работает только платная версия. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Oracle, vor 10 MonatenGood, but completely breaks netflix.
Edit: No longer breaks netflix.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 10 MonatenCan you please update the extension? The bug should be fixed in the latest version.
(The bug led to the video appearing in front of the controls. Sorry for messing up the Netflix interface and making you go through the trouble of figuring out the cause.)