Bewertungen für Web Archives
Web Archives von Armin Sebastian
Bewertungen von KirkH420
Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen
von KirkH420, vor 4 JahrenIt works to some extent, I like it's ability to open all the different web archives with one click.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
339 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Urg, vor 3 TagenThis addon includes "archive.is" (also known as "archive.today") as a default option.
Early this year, that site's owner/operator inserted malicious code into the site's captcha page, hijacking archive.is/archive.today visitors' internet connections to commit a DDOS attack on a small blog.
While debating whether to blacklist archive.is/archive.today for that alone, Wikipedia editors discovered that the site had also tampered with its own 'archived' web snapshots, altering them to insert the name of the targeted blog owner and frame them for things they never said. This was the nail in the coffin for the site's credibility as an archive.
Wikipedia blacklisted archive.is/archive.today, despite that doing so would require the replacement of almost 700,000 existing reference links.
It is not a trustworthy website.
This platform won't allow me to include a url. But source (with more details) is at arstechnica dot com slash "tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-archive-today-after-site-executed-ddos-and-altered-web-captures/".
Anyway, I am assuming the maker of this extension missed all this news, since said website is still included prominently in the extension.
I would have inquired first, before reviewing, but unfortunately github seems to detest one of my browser settings or extensions, so I can't currently use it.
In any case, if you choose to use this extension, be sure to disable the archive.is/archive.today option in its settings. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon hugh198, vor 21 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 16554821, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon hamza waterson, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19882925, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Armo, vor 2 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18285082, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon BaraShiro, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon ilovemikael, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Jatila, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon GnarlyCmdr, vor 3 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19720321, vor 4 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Dan, vor 5 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17451381, vor 5 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Jalewood, vor 5 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 15958710, vor 5 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Java, vor 6 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19611278, vor 6 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19604848, vor 6 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Anonymous, vor 7 MonatenVery useful. Information should be free for all.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon أبوعلي, vor 7 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Ugarov, vor 9 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18960744, vor 9 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Deo, vor 10 Monaten