Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
Review by Fawkes
Rated 1 out of 5
by Fawkes, 2 years ago(November 25th 2024)Used to love this extension, then the people running it started drinking the radical feminist koolaid, and refuse to have solidarity with their fellow queer folks.
They will allow people who rabidly hate on trans men and intersex identities to be marked Green, but will mark anyone Red who even dares to call out transmedicalism and transphobia if the person who's spouting such rhetoric happens to be a trans woman.
If you are a trans man and you try to talk about how you need access to reproductive health including abortions and birth control, you can be marked Red for 'speaking over trans women'.
If you are a trans woman who spends all your time praising and worshipping other trans woman but say that all trans men need to die or shut up forever and stop 'speaking over women', then you will be marked Green no matter how many trans people who are impacted by this violent rhetoric mark you red for the transphobia you are spouting.
Shinigami eyes used to be good.............. or at least it seemed like it was good. Now it is just a way to knee-jerk silence calls for solidarity within the community, because if people are relying JUST on the colors and not seeing what people are actually saying.... lots of intersex and trans men are being marked deliberately red to try to silence them by framing them as "transmisogynistic" in some way shape or form, when half the time they're literally just talking about their own daily struggles and not even mentioning trans women.
But, of course, if you've only read Whipping Girl as your sole source of "queer essay literature" and you're a trans woman, of *course* you're going to be convinced that Trans Women Are The Most Oppressed People In The World, "what's the harm in wanting all of these marginalized queer men to die based purely on their gender identity as men?" and you'll still be marked green with this extension if you think and say that shit unironically.
EDIT, November 28th 2024:
Well, the Developers have now confirmed they don't give a crap about intersectionality or solidarity, and that the only "intersectionality" that matters to them is if people worship trans woman above all others, even when those trans women are radical feminists spewing violent hatred at every single one of their trans siblings and the greater queer community at large,
including erasing the impact of the AIDS crisis on gay and bisexual men, sodomy laws, and more, creating entire accounts whose sole purpose is to stalk inclusive tags and harass and insult trans activists who don't demonize 50% of the world's population and worse.
if you're somehow all the way back on this page to see this 1 star review and you're wondering why there's so many new 5-star reviews with zero mention of the intersexism and exorsexism, the radical feminists have decided to try to artificially inflate the rating, but too bad for them, radical feminists are always the minority within a movement, and the rest of the community has banded together in solidarity to stand up again biological essentialism,
which is what the radical feminists are standing for, even if they're painting it as somehow "progressive" to demonize trans men and intersex folk for daring to *identify* as men, insisting that they are inherently evil and oppressive and benefit from the patriarchy.....
even when they have not realized yet that they are trans men (so, literally, are still cis women) or are not out of the closet because its not safe to do so (aka, presenting as a cis woman to society) -- rad fems would have you believe these people are somehow inherently dangerous and oppressive because they're men, and that somehow magically changes how they're viewed by society which hates trans people of all flavours, not just trans women as the trans-inclusive radical feminists would have you believe.
They will allow people who rabidly hate on trans men and intersex identities to be marked Green, but will mark anyone Red who even dares to call out transmedicalism and transphobia if the person who's spouting such rhetoric happens to be a trans woman.
If you are a trans man and you try to talk about how you need access to reproductive health including abortions and birth control, you can be marked Red for 'speaking over trans women'.
If you are a trans woman who spends all your time praising and worshipping other trans woman but say that all trans men need to die or shut up forever and stop 'speaking over women', then you will be marked Green no matter how many trans people who are impacted by this violent rhetoric mark you red for the transphobia you are spouting.
Shinigami eyes used to be good.............. or at least it seemed like it was good. Now it is just a way to knee-jerk silence calls for solidarity within the community, because if people are relying JUST on the colors and not seeing what people are actually saying.... lots of intersex and trans men are being marked deliberately red to try to silence them by framing them as "transmisogynistic" in some way shape or form, when half the time they're literally just talking about their own daily struggles and not even mentioning trans women.
But, of course, if you've only read Whipping Girl as your sole source of "queer essay literature" and you're a trans woman, of *course* you're going to be convinced that Trans Women Are The Most Oppressed People In The World, "what's the harm in wanting all of these marginalized queer men to die based purely on their gender identity as men?" and you'll still be marked green with this extension if you think and say that shit unironically.
EDIT, November 28th 2024:
Well, the Developers have now confirmed they don't give a crap about intersectionality or solidarity, and that the only "intersectionality" that matters to them is if people worship trans woman above all others, even when those trans women are radical feminists spewing violent hatred at every single one of their trans siblings and the greater queer community at large,
including erasing the impact of the AIDS crisis on gay and bisexual men, sodomy laws, and more, creating entire accounts whose sole purpose is to stalk inclusive tags and harass and insult trans activists who don't demonize 50% of the world's population and worse.
if you're somehow all the way back on this page to see this 1 star review and you're wondering why there's so many new 5-star reviews with zero mention of the intersexism and exorsexism, the radical feminists have decided to try to artificially inflate the rating, but too bad for them, radical feminists are always the minority within a movement, and the rest of the community has banded together in solidarity to stand up again biological essentialism,
which is what the radical feminists are standing for, even if they're painting it as somehow "progressive" to demonize trans men and intersex folk for daring to *identify* as men, insisting that they are inherently evil and oppressive and benefit from the patriarchy.....
even when they have not realized yet that they are trans men (so, literally, are still cis women) or are not out of the closet because its not safe to do so (aka, presenting as a cis woman to society) -- rad fems would have you believe these people are somehow inherently dangerous and oppressive because they're men, and that somehow magically changes how they're viewed by society which hates trans people of all flavours, not just trans women as the trans-inclusive radical feminists would have you believe.
1,428 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Galius, 2 days ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 20037153, 3 days agoI looked at the guidelines when wondering why so many pro-transgender pages are marked red and it sounds like using assigned-gender-at-birth language is being encouraged as "do not mark trans-friendly" due to transmisogyny. Julia Serrano's article on what transmisogyny is does use that language. So am I supposed to mark Julia Serrano as anti-trans??? I'm supposed to flag the woman who coined the term "transmisogyny" as being violently transphobic? That sounds rather counterproductive! Can the developer explain why this is supposed to make sense? Are people flagging others just to see them turn red? Did anti-trans people raid the app, and the mods just can't keep up?
- Rated 1 out of 5by mina, 4 days agoBeen noticing a very weird pattern of trans people of color (regardless whether they're ftm, mtf or enby) or people who point out racism within trans community being marked as red. Do not use.
- Rated 5 out of 5by bunykit, 4 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Meowing, 4 days agoReview bomb this fake trans friendly app, wouldn't be surprised if the owner is a trans women chaser who is also transphobic
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 20033086, 5 days agoI got marked red because I said I headcanoned ralsei as transmasc
- Rated 2 out of 5by woob, 6 days agoWas using this for years to avoid dealing with blatant transphobes but now half the markers are over intracommunity squabbles so it's become practically useless for that purpose. trans woman btw.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 20031774, 6 days agoInsanely transphobic, exorsexist, and intersexist, it's so disappointing
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17758123, 7 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by explodingcows54, 8 days agovery commonly see transmeds (people who police transness) marked as green and trans men marked as red, with no evidence theyre anti trans or trans friendly. lacks unbiased review.
- Rated 1 out of 5by hi, 9 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by EmpurressNepetaIII, 10 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by betseg, 11 days ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by tsintzask, 13 days agoIt works fine. Of course anything with a community-sourced database is gonna have its misfires, but overall it serves its purpose well enough.
I'd like the ability to mark stuff on mobile firefox too, though. Or at least to be able to manually import an override list, or something along those lines. - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16876736, 14 days agoif you are a trans woman you NEED this extention. if you are a trans man who knows transandrophobia is not an actual axis of oppression and wants to be more of a transfeminist you NEED this extention.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19938679, 14 days agoHorribly transphobic extension! It marks trans men/mascs, nonbinary people, and intersex people as "transphobic" for simply talking about the oppression they face, meanwhile trans women/fems are allowed to be as racist, ableist, and laterally queerphobic as they want, and they're somehow fine. The creators of this extension should be ashamed of themselves. At best, there's no oversight or verification of any kind to prevent this, and at worst, this is something they actively encourage. Absolutely disgusting.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 20016844, 14 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by BB, 19 days agoRather than correctly marking people as trans friendly/anti-trans it's being weaponized to pit Trans siblings against each other. Unless you're purposely trying to fracture the trans community, DO NOT INSTALL. Shinigami eyes cannot be trusted.
- Rated 1 out of 5by calicoCatkind, 23 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by NixDrgnslyr, 23 days agoIf you have basic information parsing skills you'll be fine using this extension. False positives are real but they can be fixed if more people use the extension lol
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17829284, 24 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19975913, 25 days agothis is not useful, easy for misinformation to spread via mass flagging campaigns. it is better to make your own opinions of someone. similar to AI it is not good to outsource your thinking ability.
- Rated 5 out of 5by lurby, a month agofantastic extension. It's very nice if you do a lot of research or news reading. I only wish that someone being colored by it included a little blurb on hover that quickly summarized why they got colored.
Don't be scared by the ratings. From what I can tell, the review bombing seems to be transmisogynists doing the DARVO thing, similar to when white people say "you know, calling people racist is the REAL racism". - Rated 5 out of 5by suiqune, a month ago