Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
Review by Firefox user 17552232
Rated 1 out of 5
by Firefox user 17552232, 2 years agoused to be fairly useful. but a lot of people keep getting reported for no reason and being labeled incorrectly. The creators are biased against certain groups (basically anyone who says there's issues in trans spaces and want to improve it, including: poc, intersex, and transmasc individuals or people who support them).
Basically not trustworthy unless you personally check everytime on your own.
Update of Feb 22nd, 2026:
I still would not recommend this for most people as much anymore as I would previously, due to how common it is for transphobes to be mislabeled as trans-friendly when only being extremely bigoted towards identities that aren't hyper fem rn due to mass reporting (while ignoring any trans women that have been transphobic, as they end up under reported in contrasts to the previous group). It's really sad to watch, but there is a lot of name-calling going on in the 5 star reviews by people as well as a heads up... usually by people upset at the concept of other trans folk facing similar difficulties that overlap in life. Please be kind to others either way if you see this review. <:(
Remember, unity matters, and we all face different levels of bigotry against us. This was supposed to help trans folks stay away from this type of situation, but has long since gone WAY far off course. If this ever got any better, I would suggest for there to be a note of what TYPE of transphobia the person did instead of simply "this is a transphobe".
There's no simple "evil vs good" situation in reality, and honestly just seeing how exactly someone was/is transphobic may be good.
To anyone who truly believe this has no flaws likely needs to realize that their social group may be in VERY extremely similar lives for a particular reason. And that isn't a good thing in this case, as it doesn't really easily let you grow as a person...? <:(
Basically not trustworthy unless you personally check everytime on your own.
Update of Feb 22nd, 2026:
I still would not recommend this for most people as much anymore as I would previously, due to how common it is for transphobes to be mislabeled as trans-friendly when only being extremely bigoted towards identities that aren't hyper fem rn due to mass reporting (while ignoring any trans women that have been transphobic, as they end up under reported in contrasts to the previous group). It's really sad to watch, but there is a lot of name-calling going on in the 5 star reviews by people as well as a heads up... usually by people upset at the concept of other trans folk facing similar difficulties that overlap in life. Please be kind to others either way if you see this review. <:(
Remember, unity matters, and we all face different levels of bigotry against us. This was supposed to help trans folks stay away from this type of situation, but has long since gone WAY far off course. If this ever got any better, I would suggest for there to be a note of what TYPE of transphobia the person did instead of simply "this is a transphobe".
There's no simple "evil vs good" situation in reality, and honestly just seeing how exactly someone was/is transphobic may be good.
To anyone who truly believe this has no flaws likely needs to realize that their social group may be in VERY extremely similar lives for a particular reason. And that isn't a good thing in this case, as it doesn't really easily let you grow as a person...? <:(
1,428 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Galius, 2 days ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 20037153, 3 days agoI looked at the guidelines when wondering why so many pro-transgender pages are marked red and it sounds like using assigned-gender-at-birth language is being encouraged as "do not mark trans-friendly" due to transmisogyny. Julia Serrano's article on what transmisogyny is does use that language. So am I supposed to mark Julia Serrano as anti-trans??? I'm supposed to flag the woman who coined the term "transmisogyny" as being violently transphobic? That sounds rather counterproductive! Can the developer explain why this is supposed to make sense? Are people flagging others just to see them turn red? Did anti-trans people raid the app, and the mods just can't keep up?
- Rated 1 out of 5by mina, 3 days agoBeen noticing a very weird pattern of trans people of color (regardless whether they're ftm, mtf or enby) or people who point out racism within trans community being marked as red. Do not use.
- Rated 5 out of 5by bunykit, 3 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Meowing, 3 days agoReview bomb this fake trans friendly app, wouldn't be surprised if the owner is a trans women chaser who is also transphobic
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 20033086, 5 days agoI got marked red because I said I headcanoned ralsei as transmasc
- Rated 2 out of 5by woob, 5 days agoWas using this for years to avoid dealing with blatant transphobes but now half the markers are over intracommunity squabbles so it's become practically useless for that purpose. trans woman btw.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 20031774, 5 days agoInsanely transphobic, exorsexist, and intersexist, it's so disappointing
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17758123, 7 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by explodingcows54, 8 days agovery commonly see transmeds (people who police transness) marked as green and trans men marked as red, with no evidence theyre anti trans or trans friendly. lacks unbiased review.
- Rated 1 out of 5by hi, 9 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by EmpurressNepetaIII, 10 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by betseg, 11 days ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by tsintzask, 12 days agoIt works fine. Of course anything with a community-sourced database is gonna have its misfires, but overall it serves its purpose well enough.
I'd like the ability to mark stuff on mobile firefox too, though. Or at least to be able to manually import an override list, or something along those lines. - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16876736, 13 days agoif you are a trans woman you NEED this extention. if you are a trans man who knows transandrophobia is not an actual axis of oppression and wants to be more of a transfeminist you NEED this extention.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19938679, 13 days agoHorribly transphobic extension! It marks trans men/mascs, nonbinary people, and intersex people as "transphobic" for simply talking about the oppression they face, meanwhile trans women/fems are allowed to be as racist, ableist, and laterally queerphobic as they want, and they're somehow fine. The creators of this extension should be ashamed of themselves. At best, there's no oversight or verification of any kind to prevent this, and at worst, this is something they actively encourage. Absolutely disgusting.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 20016844, 14 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by BB, 19 days agoRather than correctly marking people as trans friendly/anti-trans it's being weaponized to pit Trans siblings against each other. Unless you're purposely trying to fracture the trans community, DO NOT INSTALL. Shinigami eyes cannot be trusted.
- Rated 1 out of 5by calicoCatkind, 22 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by NixDrgnslyr, 22 days agoIf you have basic information parsing skills you'll be fine using this extension. False positives are real but they can be fixed if more people use the extension lol
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17829284, 24 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19975913, 25 days agothis is not useful, easy for misinformation to spread via mass flagging campaigns. it is better to make your own opinions of someone. similar to AI it is not good to outsource your thinking ability.
- Rated 5 out of 5by lurby, a month agofantastic extension. It's very nice if you do a lot of research or news reading. I only wish that someone being colored by it included a little blurb on hover that quickly summarized why they got colored.
Don't be scared by the ratings. From what I can tell, the review bombing seems to be transmisogynists doing the DARVO thing, similar to when white people say "you know, calling people racist is the REAL racism". - Rated 5 out of 5by suiqune, a month ago