Reviews for SponsorBlock - Skip Sponsorships on YouTube
SponsorBlock - Skip Sponsorships on YouTube by Ajay (SponsorBlock)
Review by cheatfreak47
Rated 5 out of 5
by cheatfreak47, 3 years agoSponsorBlock is such a funny extension to me. I don't mean that in a bad way either.
To start with, YouTube really has gone downhill huh? I mean, the fact this has to exist at all is pretty silly if you think about it. The platform is so financially unreliable that video creators have to sell their voice and influence to the highest bidder nearly constantly just to keep their lights on.
Anyway, this extension is great. It does exactly what it says- and crowdsourcing time-codes to skip over parts of videos is actually genius- it's effectively doing the same thing other adblockers do but for skipping over ads baked into videos. It's an idea I'm sure hundreds of other people had, but never bothered with, probably because it seemed kind of petty or annoying to implement.
The best part? Unlike a traditional adblocker, which for many, kind of exist in a moral gray area due to it potentially cutting off revenue to hosts and creators of online content- SponsorBlock has no such issue.
YouTuber sponsors don't base their metrics for payout on anything other than usually a preexisting, agreed upon contract for the ad itself- with views and watch time metrics being almost entirely ignored as any sort of reference for the terms.
So, in essence, it is stupid not to use SponsorBlock, because all it does is save you, the user, a lot of time by skipping ad spots- and the creators are still getting paid exactly the same.
Tangentially, I believe eventually, more sophisticated Browser Content Blockers will come to exist that will deliberately fool ad servers into thinking the ad was viewed or clicked, resulting in a similar "no loss" model for user-side adblocking. In fact, extensions like that are popping up already, but haven't yet gained much traction- since there's not been any reason to switch to them yet, but if corporations continue to be so heavy handed with trying to invasively track that sort of thing so much- if they keep flying closer to the sun with trying to prevent adblockers from working, it's going to burn them eventually. It's really not a good idea to pick fights with annoyed programmers.
In any case, SponsorBlock is a fantastic little extension that- like I said, it's almost stupid not to use it. It harms no-one, saves you time, and at the end of the day, time is a valuable resource, eh?
To start with, YouTube really has gone downhill huh? I mean, the fact this has to exist at all is pretty silly if you think about it. The platform is so financially unreliable that video creators have to sell their voice and influence to the highest bidder nearly constantly just to keep their lights on.
Anyway, this extension is great. It does exactly what it says- and crowdsourcing time-codes to skip over parts of videos is actually genius- it's effectively doing the same thing other adblockers do but for skipping over ads baked into videos. It's an idea I'm sure hundreds of other people had, but never bothered with, probably because it seemed kind of petty or annoying to implement.
The best part? Unlike a traditional adblocker, which for many, kind of exist in a moral gray area due to it potentially cutting off revenue to hosts and creators of online content- SponsorBlock has no such issue.
YouTuber sponsors don't base their metrics for payout on anything other than usually a preexisting, agreed upon contract for the ad itself- with views and watch time metrics being almost entirely ignored as any sort of reference for the terms.
So, in essence, it is stupid not to use SponsorBlock, because all it does is save you, the user, a lot of time by skipping ad spots- and the creators are still getting paid exactly the same.
Tangentially, I believe eventually, more sophisticated Browser Content Blockers will come to exist that will deliberately fool ad servers into thinking the ad was viewed or clicked, resulting in a similar "no loss" model for user-side adblocking. In fact, extensions like that are popping up already, but haven't yet gained much traction- since there's not been any reason to switch to them yet, but if corporations continue to be so heavy handed with trying to invasively track that sort of thing so much- if they keep flying closer to the sun with trying to prevent adblockers from working, it's going to burn them eventually. It's really not a good idea to pick fights with annoyed programmers.
In any case, SponsorBlock is a fantastic little extension that- like I said, it's almost stupid not to use it. It harms no-one, saves you time, and at the end of the day, time is a valuable resource, eh?
3,231 reviews
- Rated 4 out of 5by Marie ☆, 4 hours ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18835206, a day ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Grendel666, 3 days agoZainstalowałem go niedawno, ale jak dotąd, skutecznie oznacza i pomija bloki sponsorowane.
- Rated 5 out of 5by VoldoX, 4 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 20186780, 6 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Kamik, 6 days ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by KaiM4K, 8 days agoSponsorBlock is an absolute necessity for using YouTube. Unfortunately, the Firefox extension at least doesn't seem to work reliably anymore.
Regularly I'm experiencing that although the segments are listed in the timeline, they are not skipped. I cannot reproduce on which circumstances this behavior starts, but it's pretty annoying. - Rated 2 out of 5by LadyBunny, 12 days agoA really fantastic app that I wish someone else would make, but more about skipping annoying sponsor reads and less about policing anything the insanely anal retentive users of SponsorBlock deem to be 'non-content'. This is made by the same people as the soulless DeArrow add-on that lets users basically rename/rethumbnail anything they deem as "clickbait" (which is only based in the actual definition of clickbait 30% of the time) and shares a solid chunk of the same userbase, and it shows.
The entire system of SponsorBlock is based on upvoting and downvoting different segments to try and get the perfect edits. There are are plenty of people doing the Lord's work out there and giving us seemless skips - and really, I don't even mind a choppy skip, i just like that I don't have to click and skip myself. The problem with this is that from what I've seen I'm pretty sure it's only a very small minority that actually go into SponsorBlock and check different segments, because anything they don't agree with is insanely review bombed by those people. I'm also rather sure that all segments are just whatever was first submitted to the video, or what was changed by a mod of some sorts after being reported in their Discord (because yes, of course the only place to get support, report, or anything is a Discord).
Speaking of, this app + DeArrow have basically no moderation, and in some parts have absolutely NO moderation, as confirmed in their Discord! If you want to totally screw up a very small creator's day? Have absolutely at it. It only gets caught if someone reports it, and reports only happen a few times a day at most.
(Disclaimer: Don't do this? Shouldn't have to say that, but I'm saying this to point out that this is a major flaw in the system nobody seems to care about.)
Overall, download the add-on and just turn on sponsor skipping alone. Nothing else in those settings is worth diddly-squat.Developer response
posted 2 days agoThere is a reason SponsorBlock by default only skips sponsorships, because, in my opinion, the other parts are just extra bits. There is nothing wrong with only skipping sponsors! - Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 20180304, 13 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Yoshi, 15 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14551203, 15 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 20174249, 16 days agoя недумал што он на руских видосах работать будет ОН РАБОТОЕТ И САМ СКИПОЕТ ИНТЕГРАТСЕИ!!!!!!! 99/5
- Rated 5 out of 5by Benjamin, 17 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Abe, 19 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by onigari, 19 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Mark, 20 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 20164089, 20 days agoFunctions poorly (which is to say inconsistently) and expects the user to agree to terms unnecessary to the function of the extension.
Edit: and then feigns ignorance when confronted, evidently. Yeesh. - Rated 4 out of 5by earthboss, 23 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by DeadMonk, 23 days agoРазработчики сэкономили мне часы времени и много единиц нервов.