Revisiones de Clarify AI: YouTube Summaries
Clarify AI: YouTube Summaries por Clarify AI
Revisado por Tommy
Se valoró con 4 de 5
por Tommy, hace 2 añosIt works very well. Here are a few suggestions :
- When we open a YT video using "Open in new tab" (back-end), we have to reload the webpage to see the "Summarize" button when we access the tab, which is annoying.
- It's not clear how to access preferences, for example to change language.
- That would be great to have an option to disable "Minutes saved"... because I think most people don't care about that. It would help to keep a clean and minimal user interface.
- The number of "Minutes saved" is not accurate, because it takes time to read the summary, and the number that is displayed is the duration of the video. For instance, for a 30-minute video, if it takes 2 minutes to read the summary, number of minutes saved is not 30 but 28. You could reduce the number based on how long is the summary (number of words) and the average reading speed.
- The summary is great, but it would be better if it was not always referring to "The text describes..." or "The author...". I understand that the summary is from the transcript, which is text, but that would be more accurate if there was a way to tell the AI that the source is a video, and not a text (i.e. the speaker instead of the author, or the video instead of the text).
IMO, the first and the last comments should be the most important to improve. Overall, a very good extension, very simple and accurate.
- When we open a YT video using "Open in new tab" (back-end), we have to reload the webpage to see the "Summarize" button when we access the tab, which is annoying.
- It's not clear how to access preferences, for example to change language.
- That would be great to have an option to disable "Minutes saved"... because I think most people don't care about that. It would help to keep a clean and minimal user interface.
- The number of "Minutes saved" is not accurate, because it takes time to read the summary, and the number that is displayed is the duration of the video. For instance, for a 30-minute video, if it takes 2 minutes to read the summary, number of minutes saved is not 30 but 28. You could reduce the number based on how long is the summary (number of words) and the average reading speed.
- The summary is great, but it would be better if it was not always referring to "The text describes..." or "The author...". I understand that the summary is from the transcript, which is text, but that would be more accurate if there was a way to tell the AI that the source is a video, and not a text (i.e. the speaker instead of the author, or the video instead of the text).
IMO, the first and the last comments should be the most important to improve. Overall, a very good extension, very simple and accurate.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosThanks for sharing, will keep in mind your suggestions in future!
91 revisiones
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Alexandru - Thinkstation, hace 11 díasI gave this add-on only 2 stars because, starting yesterday, even though I selected Romanian for the summary (which used to work perfectly every time), it now generates the summary in Arabic. If the add-on needs an update, please release one as soon as possible to keep up with Firefox updates. Thank you, and should you manage to fix the issue, I will update my rating to 5 stars.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14343652, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por LazyBones, hace 5 mesesI love how native it feels, however you should add back the Gemini Flash model and you should allow users to insert their own API key for free usage. Please.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por iiiytn1k, hace 7 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Amaraticando, hace 9 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19099410, hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por bspkumar, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Roger, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Hydronium, hace un año
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19493194, hace un añoAbsurdalne zużycie podzespołów. Nie zdarzyło mi się, aby mi działała funkcja "Zapytaj o film". Podsumowanie filmu działa, natomiast w wersji gemini lite - inne są płatne. Gdyby wtyczka działała normalnie i nie obciążała by podzespołów to bym mógł ją zachować i dać chociaż 2 gwiazdki. Nie polecam.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Lori, hace un año
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18841148, hace un añoIt was working like a charm. But recently it only gives 3 video credit a day.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19225052, hace un año
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Keisev, hace un añoThe extension works well. But they should specify what exactly the connection to your Google account is for, since without it the extension cannot function. There should also be an option to choose which transcript it will use as a base, since there are some videos with multisubs or automatic transcription.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19142149, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por ayct, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16954877, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16304834, hace un añoidk why other ai companies try to get into yt summary market when there is decent free alternative right here,lol.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Kevin E., hace un añoI absolutely love this extension! It makes summarizing the YouTube videos in such a concise and easy to use format. I love this.
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Reggie, hace un añoGreat extension that works as advertised! I like not having to leave the YouTube tab to save time or to generate a few focus questions to help me actively learn from content. (It also feels native and looks *so much* better than other extensions when paired with transparent themes / mods in the Zen browser.)
While I like the simplicity of short vs detailed and most Gemini models often work, I do wish was a way to select e.g. Gemini 2.5 Flash or newer models when existing offers don't quite hit the mark. Allowing the user to fetch new models without waiting for the developer to add them, or even a BYOM (bring your own model) option would be great. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por angmang, hace un año
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por JacobAud, hace un año