Revisiones de DeArrow - Mejores títulos y miniaturas en Youtube
DeArrow - Mejores títulos y miniaturas en Youtube por Ajay (SponsorBlock)
Revisado por Dishater
Se valoró con 3 de 5
por Dishater, hace 2 añosLet's get this out of the way, this doesn't remove clickbait. There's too many channels posting garbage by the second for new titles to be submitted and the De-Arrow user count is a fraction of SponsorBlock's.
What this actually does is remove sensationalism from channels that people watch regularly. Sometimes to an asinine degree. (ha i know big word)
"The city with a hundred private cable cars" is a video from Tom Scott. A De-Arrow user changed this to "Wellington has over one hundred private cable cars". For some reason I guess "this city" was deemed too sensational or vague, so adding the city name and a slight rewording makes it less so?
Another Tom Scott example, "Things are changing at the world's oldest hotel" becomes "Modernization of a Japanese hotel that is technically the world's oldest operating business". Okay, an example of a title that's actually de-sensationalized by a user, but now it's longer than needed and over-descriptive. Many titles are like this, if the De-Arrow community made a restaurant menu, common delicacies would include "Not actually French potato fries" and "Ground beef patty sandwiches with vegetables, condiments, and cheese in soggy buns".
De-Arrow has a voting system where you can dislike or like submitted elements and submit your own, but the Tom Scott examples above are submitted and locked by VIPs.
What's a VIP? Well, someone with insider access who can submit titles/thumbnails and no amount of dislikes or voting can displace their locked submissions. Currently, there's no way to apply for VIP status, it's strictly for the coolest of dudes. I'd be fine with VIPs getting an voting boost based on their status, but not being able to vote on these titles is stupid. This isn't SponsorBlock, where a Sponsor segment can be objectively correct based on start/end time, someone may be able to summarize the info into something better, like "Modernization of the oldest operating hotel".
Filler tangent/jokes aside, I'd still recommend De-Arrow to display auto-generated or user-submitted thumbnails, I don't have much to complain about there other than thumbnails sometimes not loading when enabled. For title replacement, you can use the "channel allowlist" so selected channels use custom blocking settings, although some visual issues occur on YouTube when both whitelisting and blacklisting, keep that in mind.
What this actually does is remove sensationalism from channels that people watch regularly. Sometimes to an asinine degree. (ha i know big word)
"The city with a hundred private cable cars" is a video from Tom Scott. A De-Arrow user changed this to "Wellington has over one hundred private cable cars". For some reason I guess "this city" was deemed too sensational or vague, so adding the city name and a slight rewording makes it less so?
Another Tom Scott example, "Things are changing at the world's oldest hotel" becomes "Modernization of a Japanese hotel that is technically the world's oldest operating business". Okay, an example of a title that's actually de-sensationalized by a user, but now it's longer than needed and over-descriptive. Many titles are like this, if the De-Arrow community made a restaurant menu, common delicacies would include "Not actually French potato fries" and "Ground beef patty sandwiches with vegetables, condiments, and cheese in soggy buns".
De-Arrow has a voting system where you can dislike or like submitted elements and submit your own, but the Tom Scott examples above are submitted and locked by VIPs.
What's a VIP? Well, someone with insider access who can submit titles/thumbnails and no amount of dislikes or voting can displace their locked submissions. Currently, there's no way to apply for VIP status, it's strictly for the coolest of dudes. I'd be fine with VIPs getting an voting boost based on their status, but not being able to vote on these titles is stupid. This isn't SponsorBlock, where a Sponsor segment can be objectively correct based on start/end time, someone may be able to summarize the info into something better, like "Modernization of the oldest operating hotel".
Filler tangent/jokes aside, I'd still recommend De-Arrow to display auto-generated or user-submitted thumbnails, I don't have much to complain about there other than thumbnails sometimes not loading when enabled. For title replacement, you can use the "channel allowlist" so selected channels use custom blocking settings, although some visual issues occur on YouTube when both whitelisting and blacklisting, keep that in mind.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 2 añosAs for the second part of your review about "VIP" locked titles, we have partially resolved this by having now allowing them to submit segments as normal users for when it seems better to leave it up to votes. We also have a channel that logs downvoted "VIP" locked titles to fix if there are issues.
393 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por ChickyKnight118, hace 5 díasGreat addon if people contribute to it! also, i noticed that most of the one star reviews are about it being payed, it is soft-walled, so you don't actually have to pay. just click "I cant/Wont pay" or use this key: FgNKa-17de0
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por sw4usgeb0uwen, hace 6 díasIt's fun and useful/good for the brain, but it has had at least one period where it just didn't work - having it enabled would stop any youtube video from loading.
Not quite as useful as sponsorblock which i think the creator also made. Submission menu could do with some work - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Kamik, hace 7 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13298932, hace 8 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por onigari, hace 19 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Ju, hace un mes
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por user 21321321321, hace un mesSimply amazing! Shame that so many people don't understand the soft paywall...
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace un mesIt is pay what you want, you can use it for free by clicking "I don't want to pay"
or using this key: FgNKa-17de0- Se valoró con 3 de 5por a real guy honest, hace 2 mesesLove the idea but literally not a single video on my page had any submitted titles for it. My advice is to use AI to summarise the video into a title and put that in your database rather than relying on ONLY crowdsourcing.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Ythan, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 20013628, hace 2 mesesNo activation button available, only trial for 6 hours. So every 6 hours i have to reactivate it, essentially replacing one annoyance with another.
Yea, I'm never paying for this, would've considered it if it just flat out said it's a paid extension, which it is.Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace un mesClick "I don't want to pay" at the bottom, and you can use it for free, forever
Or use this key: FgNKa-17de0 - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18901250, hace 2 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por yogi, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por SleepyLatte, hace 3 mesesOpen source and community driven but give me money. Intresting concept, so the money you make, do you give it to people who actually keep this garabge running? Oh no you dont, because you totally did all of the work! Like no one else on this planet was willing to do it for free, just another cancer
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 3 mesesThis extension has a soft-paywall, you can use it for free by clicking "I can't/don't want to pay"
The code is released under the GPL license for anyone to use as see fit
Just like with SponsorBlock, the entire database of submisisons is published at https://sponsor.ajay.app/database under a creative commons license - Se valoró con 1 de 5por dysfun, hace 3 mesesapparently wants to force me to activate it before it'll work at all, except the activation button is just flat out missing. waste of time.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 3 mesesThe button shouldn't be missing, but if you are having trouble, you can send me an email: dev@ajay.app - Se valoró con 5 de 5por chefski, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por ss, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19682243, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Alpherio, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por mark100, hace 4 mesesOne of the best YouTube extensions out there.
It's up there with Sponsor block and UBlock Origin.
It's very time saving, especially when browsing through your recommendations page (it makes your digest more productive.)
Most of these big tech channel videos are frequently summarized into a small sentence.
I've found it most useful for tech videos (as most custom titles lie here)
The feature where it shows a random screenshot of the video in the thumbnail is amazing, it helps me preview videos that are obviously AI generated.
I love this extension, and I suggest others to contribute to the project by:
buying the product - it's only $1 !!!
donating to the developer.
source thumbnails and titles yourself to help expand the project!
share it with your friends.
the only problem I have with it, is that it isn't popular enough, making custom titles quite rare in normal feeds. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18414040, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por reachus_peachus, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por l0lill0, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Eti, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por CS-FF, hace 5 mesesThe remove emojis feature is not working for me. There is an original title that isn't replaced and the emojis are there despite having the option checked.
Respuesta del desarrollador
publicado el hace 5 mesesCan you verify if you are on the latest version of the extension? (2.3.6)