Revisiones de Download All Images
Download All Images por Joe Ertaba
Revisado por picurael
Se valoró con 5 de 5
por picurael, hace 7 años5 stars because I have no big complaints and it's as easy to use as possible given that every option I'd ever want is there (link scanning depth, regex, filters on size / name exclusions, auto-naming templates, ZIP) - I don't think there's any add-on left that does all of that. I use the gallery preview all the time. So, it seems like the developer thought about everything.
As for improvements, the UI could be a bit even more intuitive I think. Almost everything is perfectly clear to me, but I'm an advanced user myself, which is apparently the target class though.
And I don't know what the other user was doing, but this add-on is not responsible for "redirects to websites caught by the AV", at least not since I've been using it for a few months. I'm sure some other software that user installed was responsible for those. This add-on is among the cleanest of my add-ons.
Definitely warrants a contribution. If only all software was done with such thoroughness.
As for improvements, the UI could be a bit even more intuitive I think. Almost everything is perfectly clear to me, but I'm an advanced user myself, which is apparently the target class though.
And I don't know what the other user was doing, but this add-on is not responsible for "redirects to websites caught by the AV", at least not since I've been using it for a few months. I'm sure some other software that user installed was responsible for those. This add-on is among the cleanest of my add-ons.
Definitely warrants a contribution. If only all software was done with such thoroughness.
652 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por isk, hace 13 días
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por Weirdnez, hace 23 díasFLAKY - randomly different results every time for the same basic operation (images all in the one directory indexed xxx01 xxx02 etc). I skim-counted ~200 images, it finds 5 of them. I had set 200px image min. It found 20px images. I then set jp(e)g only, and it finds very few. Results VARY each time (semi-) randomly. Hung the browser BADLY (100% CPU & 1GB RAM used according to about:processes - which I have plenty more than). This was when it DID warn about "too slow" a setting. Without that it wasn't finding images, so it's no good either way. I don't have TIME to work out yet another confusing default settings UI! Or just a generally-confusing UI, even if defaults need to be tweaked (and I am very much into RTFM as what else is going to work?). This needs to be user-friendly in the sense of settings do what they APPEAR to do! NOTE: I am using Tor Browser set to MEDIUM security. Apologies if this is breaking the specific site functionality and this extension's behaviour is simply symptomatic of that. It is a war on privacy we're living through, be sure of that. Sites refuse to work in basic ways any more, citing bots or content-scrapers. This is when they're pirating the content in effect, themselves! Stupid humans...
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Floch Forster, hace un mesDidn't recognise all images on a NovelCrow page, now I need another extension to download that certain comic to see these two lovebirds in all of their glory.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19947912, hace 2 mesesРасширение отлично работает с браузером mozilla
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15997101, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por SilverAmd, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por NGOY Constantin, hace 3 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 13771040, hace 4 mesesI have used this extension for a long time, but nowadays it always produces a ZIP-file that seems to be invalid.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por GPRaccount, hace 4 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Mastix, hace 4 mesesZip Files always empty or windows cannot open them. It would be much better without zip.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Rosalinda, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17368533, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por 12, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Joy Cuspide, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19768603, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por swamynath, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por MonosodiumGlutamate, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por elsenfox, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Munenushi, hace 5 mesesWorks great - configurable, seems to handle any embedded graphics. Wonderfully done
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Fladrif, hace 6 meses
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Dzluck, hace 8 meses