Revisiones de Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes por Shinigami Eyes
Revisado por cmg
Se valoró con 1 de 5
por cmg, hace 2 añosEDIT: because I have been seeing the developer replies, no intersex trans women or transfems assigned female at birth literally call themselves "AFAB transfem" including the AGAB in the identity. **But it is something they could be, and thats worth talking about** any intersex transfem online could have an F on her birth certificate and had to transition to live as a woman due to intersex puberty & even forceful reassignment in childhood. As an XtM intersex man I support my XtF intersex sisters. (X in this case because plenty of intersex people consider categorizing their bodies as M/F pre-transition to be inaccurate to their physiology, not because they were literally assigned X) cisgender and transgender weren't made for us. The only way we can use these terms to express our lived experiences is to use them "incorrectly", and frankly, intersex people's labels aren't something you get a say on if you are perisex. Good day.
I used to use this as a great resource to determine which publications were trustworthy on trans issues, until it was wrongfully used against me because a handful of people disliked my demands for proper intersex inclusion.
I am an intersex activist who often talks about my struggles feeling welcome in the trans community, and about the way non-intersex trans folks could be better allies to us and our community. I run a blog where I spread useful and important information about intersex issues, I boost trans voices, and I all around am very passionate in my fight for the liberation of sex variant people of all sort. I'm against binary categorization of both gender and "biological sex". I talk about the ways in which intersex people often have "confusing" identities, I myself would consider myself cis and trans simultaneously; an identity that is incredibly connected to my messy intersex socialization. This seems to be the reason I was marked anti-trans, under the idea that my actual lived experience as an intersex person is an ""obvious troll identity"",
I've been marked red. In a conscious and calculated attempt to keep my voice as an intersex person away from trans people, my natural allies, who need to hear it the most. Good idea for an extension, terrible execution.
I used to use this as a great resource to determine which publications were trustworthy on trans issues, until it was wrongfully used against me because a handful of people disliked my demands for proper intersex inclusion.
I am an intersex activist who often talks about my struggles feeling welcome in the trans community, and about the way non-intersex trans folks could be better allies to us and our community. I run a blog where I spread useful and important information about intersex issues, I boost trans voices, and I all around am very passionate in my fight for the liberation of sex variant people of all sort. I'm against binary categorization of both gender and "biological sex". I talk about the ways in which intersex people often have "confusing" identities, I myself would consider myself cis and trans simultaneously; an identity that is incredibly connected to my messy intersex socialization. This seems to be the reason I was marked anti-trans, under the idea that my actual lived experience as an intersex person is an ""obvious troll identity"",
I've been marked red. In a conscious and calculated attempt to keep my voice as an intersex person away from trans people, my natural allies, who need to hear it the most. Good idea for an extension, terrible execution.
1446 revisiones
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por h.h., hace 18 horas
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por sd, hace 19 horasI used it for years. It used to be very good at telling if someone is more covert about their transphobia-
However, lately, the people doing all the rating and anybody who might be approving those ratings only seem to care about trans women (and not even all trans women, seemingly just the ones repeating radfem rhetoric), and nobody else. I have seen people marked red for no reason other than supporting transgender men, nonbinary people, and intersex people. Most of whom never used that "transandrophobia" term that people seem to hate so much.
Seems like trans 4channers also get marked as green frequently as well. You mean to tell me the woman I saw talking about "TME theyfab pooners" is pro-trans? She probably isn't even pro-trans in regards to herself, let alone others who don't fit specific standards. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 20071927, hace 3 días
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por SpoopySoup, hace 4 díasI just want a little bit more transparency, more options in the options page (like more colors for ones you marked yourself, or if it was verified by the team running this), maybe hover notes on why a page was submitted and colored with simple 'time updated' metadata, because what if the mark was from ages ago and nobody looked to update it if it was someone being 14 or something 10 years ago.
I use it mostly to take a page, blog, or person with a grain of salt and to look into it myself, because sometimes transmeds can be green and someone simply with unusual pronouns for their gender can be red.
I probably used this for so long every time I see a colored blog it likely is my mark that's clientside, which is why I still use it, since I constantly curate it.
Nobody can perfectly verify everything and some can fly under the radar, if you are using this plugin, PLEASE don't be afraid to mark/submit your findings too, there may be issues but you can help by submitting the correct dropdown even if its already marked. Even clearing marks is helpful. - Se valoró con 2 de 5por siam, hace 5 díasnot much help when it doesnt tell you why someone was marked red. when i come across a youtube channel marked red, and the channel is nothing but innocuous content unrelated to lgbt issues, am i supposed to just believe that? im not going through all their social media to find the truth. transphobia is a heavy accusation, you best have a good reason for it.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por tumbwr, hace 5 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16038924, hace 6 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por NyxieNyxious, hace 7 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Foosy, hace 7 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19984572, hace 11 díasThe negative reviews are from terf bots, ignore.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por tom9mi, hace 12 días
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por dreadful, hace 12 díasi don't care about tmras and transmisogynists whinging about how they're being bullied for spreading vile bs abt trans women, but i have seen actual 4tranners get marked green, including a dedicated 4tran subreddit. come the fuck on. you wouldn't call an edtwt user a feminist for saying moid.
it's just become a discourse tool now, which is functionally useless for measuring what is and is not actually unsafe for trans people (esp women) to be around. - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Jak, hace 13 días
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 20047351, hace 15 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por KYLEGUTZZ, hace 15 díasLike. SO many trans men, non-binary and intersex people are marked as transphobic on this thing for speaking about the oppression they face. So fucked. Also like. a lot of black trans people are marked red for no reason??? Racist and transphobic, avoid at all costs. If you need to check if a page or blog is transphobic, just do the work yourself.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Luna, hace 16 díasy'all the rating are community made if someone who is a trans ally is marked red it's because people using the extension marked it as red for some reason
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por bunglung, hace 17 díaspretty good. ive been using it for a while and has been largely accurate. im not sure the specifics of the process. but as of late it seems false negatives within the system have been circulating just for people combating transmisogyny. one thing that would help is when somebody is marked red or green (though it would benefit red marks the most) it gives a reason why they were marked such and a link/screenshot to where the person expressed a belief which way. don't use it without checking, especially for red marks, but it can help bring your attention to whether or not a person might be transphobic
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Galius, hace 19 díasalright I gotta swallow my pride and say that when I made my last review, I was duped. I was poorly informed by the reviews, and after using the plugin and better understanding the actual conversation around the relevant issues, I'm changing my 1 star review to a 5 star review.
Effective plugin, and it feels nice to see green names going around. Recommended if you think it would help you. - Se valoró con 2 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 20037153, hace 21 díasI looked at the guidelines when wondering why so many pro-transgender pages are marked red and it sounds like using assigned-gender-at-birth language is being encouraged as "do not mark trans-friendly" due to transmisogyny. Julia Serrano's article on what transmisogyny is does use that language. So am I supposed to mark Julia Serrano as anti-trans??? I'm supposed to flag the woman who coined the term "transmisogyny" as being violently transphobic? That sounds rather counterproductive! Can the developer explain why this is supposed to make sense? Are people flagging others just to see them turn red? Did anti-trans people raid the app, and the mods just can't keep up?
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por mina, hace 21 díasBeen noticing a very weird pattern of trans people of color (regardless whether they're ftm, mtf or enby) or people who point out racism within trans community being marked as red. Do not use.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por bunykit, hace 21 días
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Meowing, hace 21 díasReview bomb this fake trans friendly app, wouldn't be surprised if the owner is a trans women chaser who is also transphobic
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Jax, hace 23 díasWas marked red because I liked transmasc jax. Im a transman. :/