Revisiones de Video DownloadHelper
Video DownloadHelper por vdh
41.587 revisiones
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Giovanni G, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 16962573, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 3 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18133857, hace 3 añosA great product asking for to many permissions. Most insulting are:
1. Can exchange my msgs with other programs? Why would a program share what I do with anyone other than the program. Even, maybe for free, my profile (email and username)...? With my permission.... Maybe . But what messages and from and to where.
2. Can modify my browser's history?
How in the "Net" are you gone trick me to become "The Enemy of the State" when I see how you profile a "person of interest". I need to opt out that whole thing.
3. Access data for all websites?
Data is considered usernames, passwords, websites entered and exited from any website (use) and all cookies involved. WTH!
I love this product, but it is asking way to much. If Experian got hacked, what's not to stop this app from getting hacked. I give you a courtesy by swinging w me on my phone. You know when I'm using the app and what I'm doing. But your third party relationships to gossip/sale my actions is way too much comfort than any app should have with me. I have a whole human family that can do that. And for that I'm out (as the Sharks would say).
But please circle back once you've fixed those permissions. Like I said great product. - Se valoró con 5 de 5por 22SIDHU, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Loserwithlaptop, hace 3 añosVery useful extension for instance download videos without extern tools. Thankyou to devoloper.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Meysam, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Peter Chiang, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Français, hace 3 añosApp en plus de l'add on firefox à telecharge sans mention dans la description, gros QR code sur les videos telechargees pour vous demander de payer la version pro et watermark sur les videos alors que cette extension doit permettre le telechargement illegal de video youtube c'est un comble.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15515818, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por charls75, hace 3 añostodo bien hasta hace poco comenzo a descargar con baja resolucion, tarda mas tiempo y termina incrustando un codigo QR, el cual antes no existia
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Jooge, hace 3 añosOne of the best add-ons in the store. Been using it for years and finally donated. I suggest you all do the same.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Anthony, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18131717, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14429769, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17473671, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 2 de 5por jeff, hace 3 añosStole this one as its about what I was going to wrote. Used to be good years ago. Don't bother anymore. I used to use this app like 3 years ago when it was small and unknown. It was great back then. Now they're making you jump through loopholes for the same thing. Now you have to download an external app (which defeats the purpose of an extension) and they watermark your videos. This didn't happen in the past. It is a shame to see a small, unknown app that used to be great turn into a money grab. Now looking for alternatives.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14365747, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14990425, hace 3 añosFunciona de maravilla. Muy recomendable.
- Se valoró con 5 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 15848475, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 4 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18129632, hace 3 años
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Geneticshock, hace 3 añosIf you want to use this downloader get ready to pay to remove the huge watermark.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por staigea, hace 3 añosI would maybe think about donating, if the QR code was bigger than the video I was trying to download, it isn't a gentle reminder, its a big FU to the people that havent paid for it, might as well make it mandatory to pay for it. I will not be doing either one. If the QR code was smaller, I might have thought about it, but its obnoxious.