Revisiones de Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized
Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized por Wikiwand
150 revisiones
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por simurq, hace 8 díasNewer versions of the addon are getting worse with every release. AI addition is what ruins it, in my opinion. Standard Wikipedia looks prettier and loads easier without the addon's distractors.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Sushiimi, hace 11 díasWikiwand has been great for years but unfortunately, as outlined by many other reviews, has gone downhill after shoehorning in excessive AI integrations and simply becoming non-functioning for basic usage.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por TonyStr, hace un mesThis addon has been very unstable lately. It struggles to load articles and fails to load previews. This was a great reskin of wikipedia that made the interface cleaner to use, but today they rolled out a reskin that makes it look like a mobile app for some reason. They also removed perhaps the one useful functionality they had, show definition for highlighted word.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por huianxin, hace 3 mesesLike others said, used to be good. Now there's some useless new features. Stop spamming AI in my face. And worst of all, it stopped working! Keeps displaying "Article not found", making it utterly unusable. Way to ruin what was once a great app.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Elfirya, hace 5 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Howar31, hace 6 mesestoo much useless features. settings are not saved keep resetting. and also ads
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Haltarys, hace 7 mesesThe extension used to be good but now they're pushing users to subscribe, don't follow dark mode by default anymore (it resets every couple of days or so), and push the AI tab too much.
(And apparently, it has way too much ads, which I don't see because I use an ad blocker anyway) - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19053100, hace 7 mesesUsed to be really good, now it's infested with ads (ON A WIKIPEDIA SKIN, a notably ad free site) and AI bullshit everywhere, asking for a subscription. It also automatically blocks access to actual wikipedia, by automatically rerouting every article to their skin of it. No even entering the wikipedia website manually can you there with this extension installed. Where can i just get this extension, but how it was 2 or 3 years ago?
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19391462, hace 8 meseswas a good addon until constant ai ads
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Sciky, hace 9 mesesThis used to be a great extension, but now it's a bloatware full of ads for its AI, what a shame
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Indiana Moon, hace 10 mesesIt does not "enhance user experience" as stated in the add-on description section. It was good once.
Enshittification! - Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 14503325, hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19040033, hace 10 mesesUsed to be a great addon but now totally destroyed by the Ads and AI
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Ally Simy, hace 10 meses
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 19035698, hace 10 mesesEnshittification everywhere. Was a very nice plugin to cleanly read wikipedia, now cluttered with AI and ads
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por LCM, hace 10 mesesThey had the nerve to actually BLOCK people from accessing entire wikipedia pages. You are required to watch an ad before you can access the page. This is allegedly to have access to their "wikicontent," which is not needed or desired. This app used to be good. But pulling this crap was a step too far. You CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE MONEY FROM ADS.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Milan Regec, hace un añoAll it does now is infest your Wikipedia with ads. Don't bother installing and I highly recommend uninstalling it if you already did so. Even when uninstalled, it keeps coming back and keeps stealing all Wikipedia links.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 18996590, hace un año
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Toccetness, hace un añoAd-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Usuario de Firefox 17669402, hace un añoAs many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por Wolphie, hace un añoUsed to be a great extension/addon. Ruined by AI slop that apparently needs to appear everywhere now. Plus constant popups everywhere if cookies are cleared. Sad to see such a beautiful piece of work fall so low.
- Se valoró con 1 de 5por winphreak, hace un añoI can't wait until the AI screws up all the detailed trivia bits or simple math for a article summary.
Also if Wikiepedia is too hard to read for you, you should probably finish middle school.
This world is gonna get so dumb so fast I can't wait.