Critiques pour uBlock Origin
uBlock Origin par Raymond Hill
21 851 notes
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15709519 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par 焱廣, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par 奥里给 干啊兄弟们, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15708259 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Michael Anagbo Barnes, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14732211 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par vanontom, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par MAID, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14545555 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15706951 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Stephen Judge, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par gabe, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Vladimir Janowski, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par kpoplovah, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par RiCK, il y a 6 ansLast update started to request access to IP Address:
See release notes.
Changes:
uBO requires a new permission, dns, which is required to solve issue 780. This may triggers a new permission warning from Firefox when uBO updates to the latest dev build, specifically "Access IP address and hostname information", even though this was already possible for uBO to access that information.
From now on uBO will CNAME-uncloak network requests. CNAME-uncloaked network requests will appear as blue entries in the popup panel and the logger. The uncloaked entries in the popup panel will also show the related aliases (in smaller characters underneath the canonical names).
Network requests which were blocked, redirected, or excepted by a filter/rule are not uncloaked. Canonical hostnames which are first party to the associated alias hostname are not fed back into uBO's filtering engine.
Warning: CNAME-aliased hostnames exist most likely for content delivery purpose, i.e. legitimate. - Noté 5 sur 5par Nimnul, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Rupam, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15703644 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansКогда любое ПО становится популярным, возникает вопрос об его этичности по отношению к пользователям. Проблемы с правами доступа к IP твоего компа нет - dns API только позволяет резолвить доменные имена используя твой DNS, просто firefox показывает неправильное сообщение:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1617861
https://pontoon.mozilla.org/ru/firefox/all-resources/?string=176403
Прежде чем прекратить использовать uBlock Origin и писать негативный отзыв о правах на доступ к IP, пожалуйста потрать немного своего времени, чтобы прочитать что пишет об этом разработчик:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Permissions#access-ip-address-and-hostname-information
https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/780
В теории, всё может повредить твоей анонимности, но это не похоже на повод для излишнего беспокойства. Однако в случае, если ты используешь SOCKS5 и переживаешь за утечку DNS, обрати внимание на эти треды:
https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/911
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1618271
Судя по тому что в голове у разработчиков, они просто пытаются закрыть ещё один способ отслеживания. Разработчикам же firefox/расширения следует пофиксить возможность утечки локального DNS.
И кстати, фичу можно отключить: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Advanced-settings#cnameuncloak
Ещё треды на Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/f8qnpc/ublock_origin_1250_with_cname_uncloaking_is_out/
https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/f8p2cx/new_permissions_request_ip_address_and_hostname/
---
When any software becomes popular, there rises a question on it's ethics related to it's users. uBlock Origin does not access your host's IP - dns API only allows to resolve domain names using your DNS, but firefox seems to mislead users on that matter showing confusing prompts:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1617861
Before you stop using uBlock Origin and write negative review on IP permissions issue, please spare some of your time to read what developer tells about this:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Permissions#access-ip-address-and-hostname-information
https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/780
In theory, everything can damage your anonimity, but it seems there's no need to worry too much on that case.
But if you use SOCKS5 and care about DNS leaking, check those threads:
https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/911
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1618271
I hope developers are really just trying to make another way of tracking people impossible. While firefox/extension developers should fix possibility of local DNS leaks.
BTW, you can disable this feature: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Advanced-settings#cnameuncloak
And threads on Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/f8qnpc/ublock_origin_1250_with_cname_uncloaking_is_out/
https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/f8p2cx/new_permissions_request_ip_address_and_hostname/ - Noté 5 sur 5par Sin, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par TVDIGITAL, il y a 6 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12503013 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansThanks for supporting new Firefox preview for android
- Noté 5 sur 5par ForeFix, il y a 6 ansTo the people who write and spread negative reviews about the "Access IP address and hostname information" permission, please go read the patchnotes that the developer take the time to write for us for each release (+githud issues for more infos) instead of ranting and spreading misinformations. This new permission is used to uncloak hidden nasty new ways of tracking, and reveals tons of hidden CDNs in the process.
uBlock is an open source, featured extension, and Firefox developers work very closely with its developer (guess which is the first extension supported by Firefox Preview on Android?). There are plenty of contributors, meaning the code is audited by many people.
Honestly, I'm glad we have an extension like uBO with so much security and privacy features & vigilance, and actively developed through all those years.
Kudos to the main dev and all the contributors. Thanks for helping us with your hard quality work! - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15702762 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansPeople should really do more research before they write reviews. The new version is asking for "IP address and hostname information" due to a Firefox update that makes add-ons display this wording if they use the DNS API. It does not actually collect your machine's IP/hostname, contrary to what other people are claiming.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15702636 de Firefox, il y a 6 ans