Critiques pour DeepL : traduction et assistant de rédaction IA
DeepL : traduction et assistant de rédaction IA par DeepL
1 019 notes
- Noté 4 sur 5par Random Enemy Encounter, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18260472 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansExtension very well thought out and much more practical than its google translator-based counterparts
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13956211 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17615395 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17196363 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansVery, very good translater.It´s the best i know.
- Noté 5 sur 5par crok, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Peter E., il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Unk42, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par VEnZ0ja, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17590963 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par KnOwlEdge, il y a 2 ansWorst translation addon ever, with the absolute worst support I have EVER witnessed in 60 years life.
I wish them the most disgraceful utter failure. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17705859 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansTrès précis et grammaticalement parfait.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14639003 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par wн|τεbʁeλÐe®i5βaЯ1εy, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13605504 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Cy "kkm" K'Nelson, il y a 2 ansThe extension functionality is A-OK, solid 5/5. It's the implementation that kills it usefulness, and barely scrapes 0/5. I could go into the negative score numbers, but boy, where I would've stopped then...
I had to uninstall the extension because it throws its trash around all over the browser. It injects a humongous CSS stylesheet, 115KB(!) in size, into *every single open tab*, regardless of DeepL translation being ever used. I estimated that I used the selection translation pop-up at about one in every 500 to 1000 pages. This is a truly humongous waste of resources. The stylesheet contains 734 selectors, 2999 property settings and two @media width breakpoints. You'd have a hard time convincing me that this is a bare minimum necessary to display a simple pop-up box…
And then, in any case, a sensibly written extension would have delayed loading its CSS until it is actually needed, i.e. until it actually displays something. And load it into a sandbox, so that it's gone when the pop-up is closed: come think of it, DOM shadow roots were invented for a reason, and scoping resources in time was one of the two major ones. Now, the funny part, albeit not ha-ha funny: the extension does in fact use a shadow root for the pop-up, and… yes, you guessed it, loads another copy of its juggernaut CSS sheet into it. Why it also stuffs all this useless CSS everywhere it only can is beyond me, but loading the CPU with the browser's failing to match the extra 750 selectors every time the layout is recomputed—and "responsive" layouts on dynamically changing pages have to be deeply recomputed often!—isn't something I can use. I have better ways to waste my CPU than this extension.
As soon as the issue is fixed, I'm upgrading my rating to 5/5 not thinking twice. I hope that this is just an oversight, a bad design decision that could be soon reassessed and undone. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15786543 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Marie, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 2 sur 5par Hendrik, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par 命之时, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Nonac Banana, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par mahdiameri, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12949869 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Ran, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15526997 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans