Critiques pour Correcteur de texte - LanguageTool
Correcteur de texte - LanguageTool par LanguageTooler GmbH
Avis de Nonomori
5 156 notes
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14750288 de Firefox, il y a 12 heures
- Noté 1 sur 5par Fenrir Strange, il y a 19 heuresThis was a wonderful little tool for years, it is neither unique enough, nor useful enough to me to pay for this now that they want to blame AI for the change to paid premium service for spelling and grammar. y'all lost your damned minds over AI and got greedy
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18875723 de Firefox, il y a 19 heuresShame on the decision to monetise. Was great while it lasted.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Johnba98, il y a un jour
- Noté 1 sur 5par Moon Shot, il y a un jourWent premium, not useful enough, nor unique enough to pay for, especially when all it actually does is save you typing it into chat GPT with the prompt "refine this:" followed by your text.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20013628 de Firefox, il y a un jourWas never that good to begin with, not sure why i even kept it around this long, the suggestions were almost always worse than what I've already came up with.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20069747 de Firefox, il y a 2 joursWas very good but went premium only...
- Noté 1 sur 5par Dmitry, il y a 2 joursQuoting privacy policy:
> Content we collect also includes information about your browsing session and the content of websites visited when using our browser extensions. Depending on the Service you’re using, this may include the content and metadata of all websites you’re visiting during your active browser session (e.g. website text, media, publisher and author names, URLs).
It's spyware. Even if you pay for that, which I regret doing.
Interesting nuance is that I believe couple of years ago it was not like this. Since US company (probably private equity) bought this, it turned into spyware. - Noté 1 sur 5par a_bored_browser_and_writer, il y a 2 joursThis worked great for me for many years. Unfortunately, now the basic function of spelling and grammar fixes are locked behind the premium service, so it's basically useless outside of the in-browser editor for me. How sad that they've done this.
- Noté 1 sur 5par lg, il y a 2 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19605199 de Firefox, il y a 2 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20067703 de Firefox, il y a 2 joursLes fonctionnalités de base de l'extension ne sont plus disponibles gratuitement, je peux comprendre. Mais, il n'y a pas de formule "basique" à coût réduit, on nous impose la version premium qu'on ait ou non besoin des fonctionnalités supplémentaires. 50€ par an pour des fonctionnalité qui ne m'intéresse pas, c'est sans moi.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Davide, il y a 3 joursYou have to pay an abo to use the app, not just some features, the description and info of this extension are misleading
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20066961 de Firefox, il y a 3 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20066758 de Firefox, il y a 3 joursI don't mind paid extensions but it's the fact that this basic functionality has been available for free and now you're forced to pay to use it.
Worked well while it lasted but it's unusable now - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20064595 de Firefox, il y a 3 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19074622 de Firefox, il y a 3 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Starfrost, il y a 3 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19498549 de Firefox, il y a 3 joursBuilding your reputation at the expense of your "free" users to later become premium-only. Disgusting.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19696547 de Firefox, il y a 4 joursThey want you to pay to use this. It was free for many years. Must have sold to private equity.