Critiques pour Correcteur de texte - LanguageTool
Correcteur de texte - LanguageTool par LanguageTooler GmbH
Avis de torchsnow
Noté 1 sur 5
par torchsnow, il y a 3 heuresThey went fully paid now. Useless add-on now. Use Harper, which is a million times better, open source, free forever, and private.
4 953 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19644991 de Firefox, il y a 44 minutesSo, so, so much better than Grammarly. I run it with a local server (pretty easy to set up) and it doesn't get in my way!
- Noté 1 sur 5par MasterKugelblitz, il y a 2 heuresThis was a great extension for a really long time. Unfortunately, like so many companies nowadays, they decided to try and force AI on to everyone; inevitably costing them a lot of money. Instead of removing the AI features (which nobody uses), they've placed the burden of that cost on to the end user, and made the extension yet another subscription service. I've deleted my account, and removed the extension. Cheers guys!
- Noté 1 sur 5par Scase, il y a 6 heuresScummy bait and switch to paid model with a weak excuse. User Harper instead, it's free, faster, and respects your privacy.
- Noté 5 sur 5par bobylito, il y a 3 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par `cffx, il y a 3 joursUgh.... What a disappointment. Pulling the rug out from under your entire userbase by putting all functionality behind a paywall without warning. Yeah, screw you buddy.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19967570 de Firefox, il y a 3 joursIt seems the development plan was: "How can we charge more?" and someone replied, "Let's add AI." The result: the same old features and some limited, an expensive subscription. The product didn't improve enough to justify the change, but the price certainly found a way to increase. A creative strategy, indeed.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19624935 de Firefox, il y a 3 joursyeah you are dumb for this premium decision
- Noté 1 sur 5par Nidelon, il y a 4 joursWell, you knew what you were getting into when you made the extension paid. Nobody uses your AI functions, you created the problem yourself and increased costs.
- Noté 1 sur 5par NoMercyRKR, il y a 5 joursAnd with it only being a premium subscription, it's not worth it anymore.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Pelusa, il y a 5 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19964877 de Firefox, il y a 5 joursje besoin de telecharger mes application mais je n arrive pas a le faire
- Noté 5 sur 5par Try_Neck, il y a 6 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par fel the ripper, il y a 6 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12287081 de Firefox, il y a 7 joursLoved this tool until this week. Some how for some reason it keeps thinking I want to write in Spanish instead of English. I found a place to change the language and made it English again. Still everything is in Spanish.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Agent_Smith, il y a 7 jours"We've made the difficult decision to limit the LanguageTool browser extension to Premium users only". and with that basis, I have made the very easy decision to remove your extension. Hint: just because 'AI' seems to be in every conversation doesn't mean you have to force fit AI capabilities into a spell checker. Too enamored with technology?
- Noté 1 sur 5par magiKEY, il y a 9 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Infomanraf, il y a 9 joursI’ve used LanguageTool for many years and it was a core part of my writing workflow, especially in the browser.
The recent decision to move the browser extension behind a Premium paywall breaks that workflow significantly.
I understand infrastructure costs are increasing, but removing free real-time browser correction makes the tool much less accessible for long-time users.
Keeping the limited free tier (basic grammar/spelling) or offline fallback would make the transition much easier to accept. No, instead LanguageTooler GmbH chose to AI-wash their greedy, money hungry decision.
Goodbye, LanguageTool.
You were a really useful extension. - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19957142 de Firefox, il y a 9 joursIt USED to be good. But, instead of keeping good code that was effucient to run, the company behind this extension jumped onto the LLM bandwagon, and decided to force the costs of running that power-hungry junk onto the users. $15/month for a spelchekar — no way.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Vycer, il y a 10 joursAsking to use a premium account is predatory, just don't use AI.
- Noté 1 sur 5par SolarTara, il y a 10 joursMaybe if they didn't try to cram a bunch of bullshit AI into their existing decent language tool they wouldn't have insane server costs and to remove the free use version. I'll just move on thanks.
- Noté 1 sur 5par 🅱eter, il y a 10 jours"The rise of generative AI has made it more challenging to sustainably monetize our offering"
Blame AI all you want, but your extension is not that great, especially for languages other than English. - Noté 1 sur 5par shark_bloody, il y a 10 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19231021 de Firefox, il y a 10 joursYou're going down the IFTTT path, and no one will need you anymore. Greed will be your undoing.