Critiques pour Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes par Shinigami Eyes
Avis de Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18701178 de Firefox
Noté 1 sur 5
par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18701178 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansUsed to be one of my favourite extensions. I cannot express how disappointed I am to see what this has become. Allowing usage of enbyphobic/exorsexist slurs to be considered 'not enough to mark someone as transphobic', while considering those identifying in good faith with typically intersex identities as a valid reason to mark some as transphobic is frankly disgusting. An extension like this was probably doomed to fail at some point, but it's very disappointing to see it happen regardless.
Aside from the problem with the guidelines, the moderation team needs to get a handle on the blatant transandrophobia, because the last 4 red flagged accounts I've seen have just been people discussing transmasc opression. It's very easy to tell when those accounts are also transphobic in some regard and they very much were not. Though I'm going to guess that this is by design. I kept it for a while but it's not catching terfs anymore, just trans people minding their own business that yall disagree with.
edit: developer response is ridiculous. intersex people defining themselves in a way that aligns with their complex personal experiences isnt forcing trans women to label themselves as male at all. i thought we were long past treating other good faith identities as a threat. and ive seen amab transmascs too, in about equal number to afab transfems. funny how you dont mention those. personally as a trans bloke that lot hasnt made me feel threatened! maybe its time to listen to intersex people instead of keeping to your narrow, and frankly biased viewpoint.
Aside from the problem with the guidelines, the moderation team needs to get a handle on the blatant transandrophobia, because the last 4 red flagged accounts I've seen have just been people discussing transmasc opression. It's very easy to tell when those accounts are also transphobic in some regard and they very much were not. Though I'm going to guess that this is by design. I kept it for a while but it's not catching terfs anymore, just trans people minding their own business that yall disagree with.
edit: developer response is ridiculous. intersex people defining themselves in a way that aligns with their complex personal experiences isnt forcing trans women to label themselves as male at all. i thought we were long past treating other good faith identities as a threat. and ive seen amab transmascs too, in about equal number to afab transfems. funny how you dont mention those. personally as a trans bloke that lot hasnt made me feel threatened! maybe its time to listen to intersex people instead of keeping to your narrow, and frankly biased viewpoint.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 2 ansTransmasculine, intersex and xenogender people are welcome.
Just don't use "AFAB trans woman", as it forces trans women to use "AMAB" or "male", aligning your goal with that of TERFs.
Just don't use "AFAB trans woman", as it forces trans women to use "AMAB" or "male", aligning your goal with that of TERFs.
1 428 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Galius, il y a 18 heures
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20037153 de Firefox, il y a 2 joursI looked at the guidelines when wondering why so many pro-transgender pages are marked red and it sounds like using assigned-gender-at-birth language is being encouraged as "do not mark trans-friendly" due to transmisogyny. Julia Serrano's article on what transmisogyny is does use that language. So am I supposed to mark Julia Serrano as anti-trans??? I'm supposed to flag the woman who coined the term "transmisogyny" as being violently transphobic? That sounds rather counterproductive! Can the developer explain why this is supposed to make sense? Are people flagging others just to see them turn red? Did anti-trans people raid the app, and the mods just can't keep up?
- Noté 1 sur 5par mina, il y a 2 joursBeen noticing a very weird pattern of trans people of color (regardless whether they're ftm, mtf or enby) or people who point out racism within trans community being marked as red. Do not use.
- Noté 5 sur 5par bunykit, il y a 2 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Meowing, il y a 3 joursReview bomb this fake trans friendly app, wouldn't be surprised if the owner is a trans women chaser who is also transphobic
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20033086 de Firefox, il y a 4 joursI got marked red because I said I headcanoned ralsei as transmasc
- Noté 2 sur 5par woob, il y a 4 joursWas using this for years to avoid dealing with blatant transphobes but now half the markers are over intracommunity squabbles so it's become practically useless for that purpose. trans woman btw.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20031774 de Firefox, il y a 5 joursInsanely transphobic, exorsexist, and intersexist, it's so disappointing
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17758123 de Firefox, il y a 6 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par explodingcows54, il y a 7 joursvery commonly see transmeds (people who police transness) marked as green and trans men marked as red, with no evidence theyre anti trans or trans friendly. lacks unbiased review.
- Noté 1 sur 5par hi, il y a 8 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par EmpurressNepetaIII, il y a 9 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par betseg, il y a 10 jours
- Noté 4 sur 5par tsintzask, il y a 11 joursIt works fine. Of course anything with a community-sourced database is gonna have its misfires, but overall it serves its purpose well enough.
I'd like the ability to mark stuff on mobile firefox too, though. Or at least to be able to manually import an override list, or something along those lines. - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16876736 de Firefox, il y a 13 joursif you are a trans woman you NEED this extention. if you are a trans man who knows transandrophobia is not an actual axis of oppression and wants to be more of a transfeminist you NEED this extention.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19938679 de Firefox, il y a 13 joursHorribly transphobic extension! It marks trans men/mascs, nonbinary people, and intersex people as "transphobic" for simply talking about the oppression they face, meanwhile trans women/fems are allowed to be as racist, ableist, and laterally queerphobic as they want, and they're somehow fine. The creators of this extension should be ashamed of themselves. At best, there's no oversight or verification of any kind to prevent this, and at worst, this is something they actively encourage. Absolutely disgusting.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 20016844 de Firefox, il y a 13 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par BB, il y a 18 joursRather than correctly marking people as trans friendly/anti-trans it's being weaponized to pit Trans siblings against each other. Unless you're purposely trying to fracture the trans community, DO NOT INSTALL. Shinigami eyes cannot be trusted.
- Noté 1 sur 5par calicoCatkind, il y a 21 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par NixDrgnslyr, il y a 22 joursIf you have basic information parsing skills you'll be fine using this extension. False positives are real but they can be fixed if more people use the extension lol
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17829284 de Firefox, il y a 23 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19975913 de Firefox, il y a 24 joursthis is not useful, easy for misinformation to spread via mass flagging campaigns. it is better to make your own opinions of someone. similar to AI it is not good to outsource your thinking ability.
- Noté 5 sur 5par lurby, il y a un moisfantastic extension. It's very nice if you do a lot of research or news reading. I only wish that someone being colored by it included a little blurb on hover that quickly summarized why they got colored.
Don't be scared by the ratings. From what I can tell, the review bombing seems to be transmisogynists doing the DARVO thing, similar to when white people say "you know, calling people racist is the REAL racism". - Noté 5 sur 5par suiqune, il y a un mois