Critiques pour Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized
Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized par Wikiwand
Avis de somna
Noté 3 sur 5
par somna, il y a 5 ansI don't think this is for me - it's so unlike Wikipedia. I did start to appreciate it after trying it for some time (I especially like the nav bar on the left), but I also encountered quite a lot of issues, so I think I'll stick to regular Wikipedia in the meantime.
- Infoboxes look terrible. Images are off-center and the infobox is too close to the body of the article.
- Tables are sometimes split up when they have multiple headers.
- I also think content in tables needs more horizontal padding.
Dark mode certainly needs more work.
- Some elements still have a light background and the light text on it is difficult to see.
- Links in dark mode are gray, which is absurd.
- The text is a bit too bright for me. Either a lighter background or darker text would be easier on the eyes.
- Page previews disappear too slowly when my cursor moves away from it. Waiting for one to go away gets annoying when I'm trying to read the article content.
- The font looks horrid when both italicized and bold.
I understand that some of these issues might be caused by Wikipedia's own architecture, but I'm opting out regardless.
- Infoboxes look terrible. Images are off-center and the infobox is too close to the body of the article.
- Tables are sometimes split up when they have multiple headers.
- I also think content in tables needs more horizontal padding.
Dark mode certainly needs more work.
- Some elements still have a light background and the light text on it is difficult to see.
- Links in dark mode are gray, which is absurd.
- The text is a bit too bright for me. Either a lighter background or darker text would be easier on the eyes.
- Page previews disappear too slowly when my cursor moves away from it. Waiting for one to go away gets annoying when I'm trying to read the article content.
- The font looks horrid when both italicized and bold.
I understand that some of these issues might be caused by Wikipedia's own architecture, but I'm opting out regardless.
687 notes
- Noté 1 sur 5par LL, il y a 10 joursDisgusting that this once amazing app is now profiting on the free wikipedia. The developers should be ashamed of themselves. Uninstalling.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Johannes Häusler, il y a un moisIt really went down. what once was a nice skin for Wikipedia is now a really ducked up platform where Wikipedia does not profit. It DOES sell data and DOES have paid features so I dont think the extension is correctly disclosing such stuff, which is bad, especially in the EU
- Noté 1 sur 5par Frkid, il y a un moisIt was such a good add-on. Shame it turned into this.. whatever this is.
- Noté 1 sur 5par sausje, il y a un moisSadly this has gone down the drain. Forcing you to make an account just to sell the data for it.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19929310 de Firefox, il y a un moisThat you would take something as pure as free, open-access education, slap a skin on it and try to harvest people's data shows what a bottom feeder this dev is.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Silvio, il y a un moisForces you to create an account for no apparent reason. Disregard old 5 star reviews, this is trash now. Ensh*ttification at its finest.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Recharger, il y a un moisFinally reached my breaking point with this extension which used to be amazing. Making me register is the last straw. I'll miss the good old days!
- Noté 1 sur 5par DadManBlues, il y a 2 moisThe latest version forces mandatory registration and sign-in. I don't see the point in that at all. I have around 2 dozen Ff plugins in use - none of them forces registration.
I'm sorry, I'll miss you. - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14209344 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par simurq, il y a 3 moisNewer versions of the addon are getting worse with every release. AI addition is what ruins it, in my opinion. Standard Wikipedia looks prettier and loads easier without the addon's distractors.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Sushiimi, il y a 3 moisWikiwand has been great for years but unfortunately, as outlined by many other reviews, has gone downhill after shoehorning in excessive AI integrations and simply becoming non-functioning for basic usage.
- Noté 2 sur 5par NoxlynU, il y a 3 moisThe old design was really modern and better than Wikipedia's, and there were many customization options.
However, the new design is way less confortable and customizable.
The only addition is intrusive AI.
Wikipedia is better without Wikiwand now. - Noté 1 sur 5par huianxin, il y a 5 moisLike others said, used to be good. Now there's some useless new features. Stop spamming AI in my face. And worst of all, it stopped working! Keeps displaying "Article not found", making it utterly unusable. Way to ruin what was once a great app.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19567302 de Firefox, il y a 7 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Elfirya, il y a 7 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Howar31, il y a 8 moistoo much useless features. settings are not saved keep resetting. and also ads
- Noté 1 sur 5par Haltarys, il y a 9 moisThe extension used to be good but now they're pushing users to subscribe, don't follow dark mode by default anymore (it resets every couple of days or so), and push the AI tab too much.
(And apparently, it has way too much ads, which I don't see because I use an ad blocker anyway) - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19053100 de Firefox, il y a 10 moisUsed to be really good, now it's infested with ads (ON A WIKIPEDIA SKIN, a notably ad free site) and AI bullshit everywhere, asking for a subscription. It also automatically blocks access to actual wikipedia, by automatically rerouting every article to their skin of it. No even entering the wikipedia website manually can you there with this extension installed. Where can i just get this extension, but how it was 2 or 3 years ago?
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19391462 de Firefox, il y a 10 moiswas a good addon until constant ai ads
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19114790 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Sciky, il y a un anThis used to be a great extension, but now it's a bloatware full of ads for its AI, what a shame