Beoardielingen foar Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes troch Shinigami Eyes
Wurdearringen foar Firefox-brûker 17552232
Wurdearring: 1 fan 5
troch Firefox-brûker 17552232, 2 jierren lynused to be fairly useful. but a lot of people keep getting reported for no reason and being labeled incorrectly. The creators are biased against certain groups (basically anyone who says there's issues in trans spaces and want to improve it, including: poc, intersex, and transmasc individuals or people who support them).
Basically not trustworthy unless you personally check everytime on your own.
Update of Feb 22nd, 2026:
I still would not recommend this for most people as much anymore as I would previously, due to how common it is for transphobes to be mislabeled as trans-friendly when only being extremely bigoted towards identities that aren't hyper fem rn due to mass reporting (while ignoring any trans women that have been transphobic, as they end up under reported in contrasts to the previous group). It's really sad to watch, but there is a lot of name-calling going on in the 5 star reviews by people as well as a heads up... usually by people upset at the concept of other trans folk facing similar difficulties that overlap in life. Please be kind to others either way if you see this review. <:(
Remember, unity matters, and we all face different levels of bigotry against us. This was supposed to help trans folks stay away from this type of situation, but has long since gone WAY far off course. If this ever got any better, I would suggest for there to be a note of what TYPE of transphobia the person did instead of simply "this is a transphobe".
There's no simple "evil vs good" situation in reality, and honestly just seeing how exactly someone was/is transphobic may be good.
To anyone who truly believe this has no flaws likely needs to realize that their social group may be in VERY extremely similar lives for a particular reason. And that isn't a good thing in this case, as it doesn't really easily let you grow as a person...? <:(
Basically not trustworthy unless you personally check everytime on your own.
Update of Feb 22nd, 2026:
I still would not recommend this for most people as much anymore as I would previously, due to how common it is for transphobes to be mislabeled as trans-friendly when only being extremely bigoted towards identities that aren't hyper fem rn due to mass reporting (while ignoring any trans women that have been transphobic, as they end up under reported in contrasts to the previous group). It's really sad to watch, but there is a lot of name-calling going on in the 5 star reviews by people as well as a heads up... usually by people upset at the concept of other trans folk facing similar difficulties that overlap in life. Please be kind to others either way if you see this review. <:(
Remember, unity matters, and we all face different levels of bigotry against us. This was supposed to help trans folks stay away from this type of situation, but has long since gone WAY far off course. If this ever got any better, I would suggest for there to be a note of what TYPE of transphobia the person did instead of simply "this is a transphobe".
There's no simple "evil vs good" situation in reality, and honestly just seeing how exactly someone was/is transphobic may be good.
To anyone who truly believe this has no flaws likely needs to realize that their social group may be in VERY extremely similar lives for a particular reason. And that isn't a good thing in this case, as it doesn't really easily let you grow as a person...? <:(
1.449 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch windowsxp, ien dei lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch opek, ien dei lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Incendiary, ien dei lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch h.h., 2 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch sd, 3 dagen lynI used it for years. It used to be very good at telling if someone is more covert about their transphobia-
However, lately, the people doing all the rating and anybody who might be approving those ratings only seem to care about trans women (and not even all trans women, seemingly just the ones repeating radfem rhetoric), and nobody else. I have seen people marked red for no reason other than supporting transgender men, nonbinary people, and intersex people. Most of whom never used that "transandrophobia" term that people seem to hate so much.
Seems like trans 4channers also get marked as green frequently as well. You mean to tell me the woman I saw talking about "TME theyfab pooners" is pro-trans? She probably isn't even pro-trans in regards to herself, let alone others who don't fit specific standards. - Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 20071927, 5 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch SpoopySoup, 6 dagen lynI just want a little bit more transparency, more options in the options page (like more colors for ones you marked yourself, or if it was verified by the team running this), maybe hover notes on why a page was submitted and colored with simple 'time updated' metadata, because what if the mark was from ages ago and nobody looked to update it if it was someone being 14 or something 10 years ago.
I use it mostly to take a page, blog, or person with a grain of salt and to look into it myself, because sometimes transmeds can be green and someone simply with unusual pronouns for their gender can be red.
I probably used this for so long every time I see a colored blog it likely is my mark that's clientside, which is why I still use it, since I constantly curate it.
Nobody can perfectly verify everything and some can fly under the radar, if you are using this plugin, PLEASE don't be afraid to mark/submit your findings too, there may be issues but you can help by submitting the correct dropdown even if its already marked. Even clearing marks is helpful. - Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch siam, 7 dagen lynnot much help when it doesnt tell you why someone was marked red. when i come across a youtube channel marked red, and the channel is nothing but innocuous content unrelated to lgbt issues, am i supposed to just believe that? im not going through all their social media to find the truth. transphobia is a heavy accusation, you best have a good reason for it.
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch tumbwr, 7 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 16038924, 8 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch NyxieNyxious, 8 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Foosy, 9 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19984572, 12 dagen lynThe negative reviews are from terf bots, ignore.
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch tom9mi, 14 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch dreadful, 14 dagen lyni don't care about tmras and transmisogynists whinging about how they're being bullied for spreading vile bs abt trans women, but i have seen actual 4tranners get marked green, including a dedicated 4tran subreddit. come the fuck on. you wouldn't call an edtwt user a feminist for saying moid.
it's just become a discourse tool now, which is functionally useless for measuring what is and is not actually unsafe for trans people (esp women) to be around. - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Jak, 15 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 20047351, 17 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch KYLEGUTZZ, 17 dagen lynLike. SO many trans men, non-binary and intersex people are marked as transphobic on this thing for speaking about the oppression they face. So fucked. Also like. a lot of black trans people are marked red for no reason??? Racist and transphobic, avoid at all costs. If you need to check if a page or blog is transphobic, just do the work yourself.
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Luna, 18 dagen lyny'all the rating are community made if someone who is a trans ally is marked red it's because people using the extension marked it as red for some reason
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch bunglung, 19 dagen lynpretty good. ive been using it for a while and has been largely accurate. im not sure the specifics of the process. but as of late it seems false negatives within the system have been circulating just for people combating transmisogyny. one thing that would help is when somebody is marked red or green (though it would benefit red marks the most) it gives a reason why they were marked such and a link/screenshot to where the person expressed a belief which way. don't use it without checking, especially for red marks, but it can help bring your attention to whether or not a person might be transphobic
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Galius, 21 dagen lynalright I gotta swallow my pride and say that when I made my last review, I was duped. I was poorly informed by the reviews, and after using the plugin and better understanding the actual conversation around the relevant issues, I'm changing my 1 star review to a 5 star review.
Effective plugin, and it feels nice to see green names going around. Recommended if you think it would help you. - Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 20037153, 22 dagen lynI looked at the guidelines when wondering why so many pro-transgender pages are marked red and it sounds like using assigned-gender-at-birth language is being encouraged as "do not mark trans-friendly" due to transmisogyny. Julia Serrano's article on what transmisogyny is does use that language. So am I supposed to mark Julia Serrano as anti-trans??? I'm supposed to flag the woman who coined the term "transmisogyny" as being violently transphobic? That sounds rather counterproductive! Can the developer explain why this is supposed to make sense? Are people flagging others just to see them turn red? Did anti-trans people raid the app, and the mods just can't keep up?
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch mina, 23 dagen lynBeen noticing a very weird pattern of trans people of color (regardless whether they're ftm, mtf or enby) or people who point out racism within trans community being marked as red. Do not use.