Beoardielingen foar Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes troch Shinigami Eyes
Wurdearringen foar Evelynn Winters
Wurdearring: 2 fan 5
troch Evelynn Winters, 2 jierren lynThis extension would be good, if it has some changes, and better management
This is okay for determining whether someone has weighed in on trans people in general
However, it does not do well with saying whether it's positively or negatively
I personally haven't seen many mislabels, but with how it's set up, I have absolutely no doubt that it's happening. You can just report things as good or bad with absolutely no explanation or proof even as an optional thing
This could be very helpful, but it should function with different methods from current
Here is how I would do it if I knew how: To mark something, you HAVE to provide an explanation at minimum. Then, people can view those explanations, and report the ones that are outright false, or just placeholder text to be removed. So, instead of just seeing the colour with no context, you can see WHY people marked them that colour
Unless they do that, this is not an extension I can actually recommend, just due to the very poor structuring of it that leaves it easy to exploit
We are all in this together, we all suffer together, and we need to work together. This extension currently works against that, unless you specifically just view it how I said to, as a way to identify if someone has said ANYTHING about trans people. But due to the colours, it's very difficult to actually be unbiased about it. If there was no green or red, and all just one colour, it'd be okay, but the green and red subconsciously make you biased when judging them
This is okay for determining whether someone has weighed in on trans people in general
However, it does not do well with saying whether it's positively or negatively
I personally haven't seen many mislabels, but with how it's set up, I have absolutely no doubt that it's happening. You can just report things as good or bad with absolutely no explanation or proof even as an optional thing
This could be very helpful, but it should function with different methods from current
Here is how I would do it if I knew how: To mark something, you HAVE to provide an explanation at minimum. Then, people can view those explanations, and report the ones that are outright false, or just placeholder text to be removed. So, instead of just seeing the colour with no context, you can see WHY people marked them that colour
Unless they do that, this is not an extension I can actually recommend, just due to the very poor structuring of it that leaves it easy to exploit
We are all in this together, we all suffer together, and we need to work together. This extension currently works against that, unless you specifically just view it how I said to, as a way to identify if someone has said ANYTHING about trans people. But due to the colours, it's very difficult to actually be unbiased about it. If there was no green or red, and all just one colour, it'd be okay, but the green and red subconsciously make you biased when judging them
1.439 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 16038924, 9 oeren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch NyxieNyxious, 21 oeren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Foosy, 2 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19984572, 5 dagen lynThe negative reviews are from terf bots, ignore.
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch tom9mi, 6 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch dreadful, 7 dagen lyni don't care about tmras and transmisogynists whinging about how they're being bullied for spreading vile bs abt trans women, but i have seen actual 4tranners get marked green, including a dedicated 4tran subreddit. come the fuck on. you wouldn't call an edtwt user a feminist for saying moid.
it's just become a discourse tool now, which is functionally useless for measuring what is and is not actually unsafe for trans people (esp women) to be around. - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Jak, 7 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 20047351, 9 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch KYLEGUTZZ, 10 dagen lynLike. SO many trans men, non-binary and intersex people are marked as transphobic on this thing for speaking about the oppression they face. So fucked. Also like. a lot of black trans people are marked red for no reason??? Racist and transphobic, avoid at all costs. If you need to check if a page or blog is transphobic, just do the work yourself.
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Luna, 10 dagen lyny'all the rating are community made if someone who is a trans ally is marked red it's because people using the extension marked it as red for some reason
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch bunglung, 12 dagen lynpretty good. ive been using it for a while and has been largely accurate. im not sure the specifics of the process. but as of late it seems false negatives within the system have been circulating just for people combating transmisogyny. one thing that would help is when somebody is marked red or green (though it would benefit red marks the most) it gives a reason why they were marked such and a link/screenshot to where the person expressed a belief which way. don't use it without checking, especially for red marks, but it can help bring your attention to whether or not a person might be transphobic
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Galius, 14 dagen lynalright I gotta swallow my pride and say that when I made my last review, I was duped. I was poorly informed by the reviews, and after using the plugin and better understanding the actual conversation around the relevant issues, I'm changing my 1 star review to a 5 star review.
Effective plugin, and it feels nice to see green names going around. Recommended if you think it would help you. - Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 20037153, 15 dagen lynI looked at the guidelines when wondering why so many pro-transgender pages are marked red and it sounds like using assigned-gender-at-birth language is being encouraged as "do not mark trans-friendly" due to transmisogyny. Julia Serrano's article on what transmisogyny is does use that language. So am I supposed to mark Julia Serrano as anti-trans??? I'm supposed to flag the woman who coined the term "transmisogyny" as being violently transphobic? That sounds rather counterproductive! Can the developer explain why this is supposed to make sense? Are people flagging others just to see them turn red? Did anti-trans people raid the app, and the mods just can't keep up?
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch mina, 15 dagen lynBeen noticing a very weird pattern of trans people of color (regardless whether they're ftm, mtf or enby) or people who point out racism within trans community being marked as red. Do not use.
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch bunykit, 15 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Meowing, 16 dagen lynReview bomb this fake trans friendly app, wouldn't be surprised if the owner is a trans women chaser who is also transphobic
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Jax, 17 dagen lynWas marked red because I liked transmasc jax. Im a transman. :/
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 20033086, 17 dagen lynI got marked red because I said I headcanoned ralsei as transmasc
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch woob, 17 dagen lynWas using this for years to avoid dealing with blatant transphobes but now half the markers are over intracommunity squabbles so it's become practically useless for that purpose. trans woman btw.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 20031774, 18 dagen lynInsanely transphobic, exorsexist, and intersexist, it's so disappointing
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 17758123, 19 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch explodingcows54, 20 dagen lynvery commonly see transmeds (people who police transness) marked as green and trans men marked as red, with no evidence theyre anti trans or trans friendly. lacks unbiased review.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch hi, 21 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch EmpurressNepetaIII, 22 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch betseg, 23 dagen lyn