Beoardielingen foar Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized
Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized troch Wikiwand
677 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch Eonir, ien jier lynWhen I open a wikipedia article, 70% of the screen is covered by either AI bullshit, or a huge window with new settings, 90% of which are behind a paywall.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 17143382, ien jier lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch DS, ien jier lynLove how Wikiwand used to be an incredibly useful product that made Wikipedia more readable and now it's... "AI-driven" slop garbage that no one wants or asked for. Yet another product "improving" itself right out of usefulness. What a waste.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 17984040, ien jier lynShoves GenAI garbage down your throat and the pop ups blocks half the screen. Also sells your data. Just go use something like Modern for Wikipedia
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14774990, ien jier lynGreat design, but ruined by first having AI shoved in my face and now ads everywhere. Back to classic Wikipedia.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Steedlan, ien jier lynWas great, but the recent changes made the UI awful and turn this add-on into a whole cash cow that is against the principles of Wikipedia
- Too much ads, trying to hide bring to a paywall, adding CSS doesn't worth 5$. Even with an adblock the banner background stays.
- They added an AI that is completely useless and only here to surf on the trend of AIs.
- Talking about ads it requires a Wikimand account despite that Wikipedia already have one
We can't accept an add-on that makes money off Wikipedia - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Mlse, ien jier lynused to be good, then over the years it became incrementally more annoying to use. first all this AI/ account stuff (which was tolerable but annoyinh), paywalls and now ads everywhere. its just not worth it for that marginal improvement over stock wiki.
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Dirk R G Janssens, ien jier lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18160256, ien jier lynWas once good, now it is terrible and full of ads.
The ads can be blocked with an ad-blocker but it will leave placeholder boxes. If you're using ublock Origin, you can remove them with the "block Element function" though you will need to tune it to remove them entirely.
Target the 'remove ads' part, and tune the left slider once to the left. Preview shows the results in real-time. - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Kioraga, ien jier lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Aphotic, ien jier lynnow its filled with ads, 1 star.
alternative addon:
Modern for Wikipedia
by Modern Redesigns - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Schorle, ien jier lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 16073868, ien jier lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18749240, ien jier lynWikiwand used to be great. It was a bit annoying when the AI features were shoved in my face, but it was at least tolerable. However, ads have been added recently, and even if I use an ad blocker there are still placeholders breaking the page layout.
RIP Wikiwand. - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Mikaïl, ien jier lynThe AI features are useless, used it once and didn't even answer my question, might as well use ChatGPT for AI
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch OzMerry, ien jier lynSo, I wrote a negative review yesterday (which I've now deleted), but it appears that the Wikiwand add-on was updated yesterday and it's now working again. Yay! The AI Tools block on the right can be minimised and an ad blocker takes care of ads, but I may just upgrade to a paid version anyway since I use Wikipedia a lot and WIkiwand (pro) is very reasonably priced and supports the existing and ongoing development efforts of a great add-on. FWIW, I think it's worth it to get a much better reading experience than ordinary Wikipedia for frequent users.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Richard Yan, ien jier lynUsed to be great with beautiful styles. When the AI stuff rolled out, I felt like it was bad taste but stuck with it. Then came the ads, on top of hard work by volunteers editing wikipedia. I guess we do live in a capitalist society with insatiable corporate greed, but the least I could do is to stop using this expired plugin. Oh and also, no, some lines of CSS is not worth $5 a month.
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch Tamm Horsfall, ien jier lynPutting ads and AI-slop on a free to use webpage is peak greed, well done. You are a shadow of your former self.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch linuxenjoyer, ien jier lynIt was good for a while but they added AI stuff nobody asked for and you now have to be logged into their system for data collection if you don't want to get served ads.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Nick, ien jier lynI'll stick with Wiki's default look if it means no ads, no random AI stuff, etc. Have been a user for some time, but I guess all good things must come to an end.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18744013, ien jier lynI've used this extension for quite some time and it used to work flawlessly. As of recent updates Wikiwand started to inject advertisements into Wikipedia pages even though Wikipedia, by principles, is free from ads. It's absolutely unacceptable.